No.
It's been /feared/ in every century, it's never been true. Just paranoid fantasies combined with half-truths about various elites of the day.
2007-08-03 12:02:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
they're already here - and getting stronger
Check out the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), The Round Table, The Club of Rome, The Chatham House, formally known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs , The Trilateral Commission (TC) etc,
also look at the Oligarchs who control the 3Ms Media, Military (industrial complex) and Money (the Federal Reserve, The European Central Bank, The Bank Of England etc also The World Bank, The IMF The Bank of International Settlements etc) and Media which is being concentrated in fewer and fewer hands
The removing of national sovereignty and it being transferred to "super state" institutions like that of the E.U The NAU the ASEAN etc .
and thru uncontrolled immigration into the developed world which helps destroy national and social cohesion and undermine the middle classes in western countries.
Food security is being destroyed- how many developed countries could feed themselves if foreign trade ceased tomorrow? Could the US or the UK? countries which can't are already being held to ransom by those who control trade.
The UN, particularly thru using environmental issues as a Trojan horse are promoting concepts as 'sustainable development' from the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and "agenda 21" which will increase global control on the world's population.
day by day there is a increasing global takeover - of which the War of Terror is a major part both as a source of massive porfit for the MIC and bankers and as a pretext of the removal of civil liberties and the growth of a surveillance society - businesses are being brought up by fewer and fewer hands.
It's time to start taking all this seriously.
2007-08-04 05:07:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by celvin 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
What we saw the last month, when he proposed more war against more "foes" was the madman the last six years have created. This time, in his war against Iran, he doesn't even feel the need for minimal PR, as he did before attacking Iraq. All he is bothering with are signals -- ships moving here, admirals moving there, consulates being raided in this other place. He no longer cares about the opinions of the voters, the Congress, the generals, the press, and he especially disdains the opinions of B/S/and B [Bush Sr, Scrowcroft, Baker]. Thanks to Gerson, he identifies his own little ideas with God (a blasphemy, of course, but hey, there's lots of precedent on this), so there's no telling what he will do.
We can tell by the evidence of the last two months that whatever it is, it will be exactly the thing that the majority of the voters do not want him to do, exactly the thing that James Baker himself doesn't want him to do. The propaganda that Bush's sponsors and handlers have poured forth has ceased to persuade the voters but succeeded beyond all measure in convincing the man himself.
He will tell himself that God is talking to him, or that he is possessed of an extra measure of courage, or he that he is simply compelled to do whatever it is. The soldiers will pay the price in blood. We will pay the price in money. The Iraqis will pay the price in horror. The Iranians will pay the price, possibly, in the almost unimaginable terror of nuclear attack. Probably, the Israelis will pay the price, too.
Little George isn't the same guy he was in 2000, the guy described by Gail Sheehy in her Vanity Fair profile -- hyper-competitive and dyslexic, prone to cheat at games, always swinging between screwing up and making up, hating criticism and disagreement, careless of others but often charming. He is no longer the guy who the Republicans thought they could control (unlike, say, McCain).
The small pathologies of Bush the candidate have, thanks to the purposes of the neocons and the religious right, been enhanced and upgraded. We have a bona fide madman now, who thinks of himself in a grandiose way as single-handedly turning the tide of history. Some of his Frankensteins have bailed, some haven't dared to, and others still seem to believe. His actions and his orders, especially about Iran, seem to be telling us that he will stop at nothing to prove his dominance. The elder Bush(es), Scrowcroft, Baker, and their friends, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gerson, and the neocons have made the monster and in the process endangered the country, the Constitution, and the world, not to mention the sanity of wretches like Jose Padilla.
Maybe the bums planned this mess for their own profit, or maybe they planned to profit without mess; maybe some of them regret what they have wrought. However, they all share the blame for whatever he does next.
2007-08-03 19:01:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
They *already* control the world...and have for quite some time.
The non-existence of any proof that such a conspiracy exists merely highlights just how effectively they control everything, especially information.
They also have us convinced that such control is not possible due to the logisitics involved. In reality, it is just a matter of controlling the organizations that govern the world.
2007-08-03 19:16:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mathsorcerer 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
We are already in the eleventh hour. Stand up for individual freedoms. Research, to gain understanding, then work to enlighten others.
Power to the People!
2007-08-03 19:12:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by mazeman25 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
The world? Come on..there are neighborhood that aren't even under control.....cities..like Baghdad....entire countries like Sudan. It's not possible to administer more than a maximum physical size of land mass. I wouldn't lose sleep over this one...not that some retardo won't try. (The occupation of Iraq for example.)
2007-08-03 19:07:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Noah H 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
There are three already.
Oil Barons, Media Barons, and I.T..
They only have to link up and the World is ruled by them.
2007-08-04 02:23:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by rogerglyn 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's already happening!
Don't you remember Bush Senior's speech about "The New World Order"?
Regional Political/Economic consolidation, IE: The E.U. & N.A.F.T.A. among others. One day it will be one world/one goverment!
2007-08-03 19:08:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by bender_xr217 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Bush seems to think he could do it
2007-08-03 19:03:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
they do already and have done for many years.
2007-08-07 08:40:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Drunvalo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋