No I don't want her to win, I do not feel she will and I also do not feel she is qualified.
One Clinton is more than enough!
2007-08-03 11:49:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ ♥Be Happi♥ ♥ 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
I don't think she will and not because she's a woman but because she's so polarizing. More people dislike her than not and question her motives.
She apparently is never to blame for anything -- there is a vast right-wing conspiracy that is apparently much smarter then she is. Every mistake is someone tricking her, if she is that incompetent with fellow Americans what will foreign delegations do to her? She could take a page out of her husband's playbook and give nuclear secrets and materials or maybe schedule direct talks with North Korea without telling our South Korean allies after all she'll be tricked into it, it's not her fault.
Lastly she is a blatant socialist, she doesn't believe in the American way of picking ones self up by the boot straps, it's easier to just let Uncle Sam take care you from cradle to grave -- as long as Hillary's making the calls.
2007-08-03 19:06:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Russ 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't think she was ever meant to. I'm fairly certain that the DNC put her out front as a decoy, to draw most of the fire from the other candidates, so that the winner enters the General Election a little less mud-splattered than normal. The reason I think so, is that Mrs. Clinton is just way too easy of a target, after all the legal troubles she cause during her husbands Presidency. There are cleaner female candidates that the Democrats could have put forward, but they chose a well known (and not well-loved) candidate to put forward instead. That's my theory anyway.
2007-08-03 18:57:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Beardog 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think she has, like most of the democrats, demonstrated to the American people who they actually are. They don't even dare pretend to not be radical by going to a DLC function. I think she will win the democrat nomination and do for the nation what she was larger responsible for last time it happened and that is a take over of all government offices by Republicans. Hillary is an embarrassment. What is funny is that she is too conservative for many. WOW, what a gift.
2007-08-03 18:55:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by bravozulu 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
I feel she will easily win the primary but never make it out alive when it comes to the general election and she is forced to answer real questions and compare her views with the conservatives head to head. She carries way to much baggage and she is disliked by a majority of Americans.
2007-08-03 20:22:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pro-American 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
As things stand now, yes, that seems plausible. She has a strong and growing lead for the nomination, while none of the republican contenders are showing any momentum. At the rate money is being raised, she'll be able to outspend any republican challenger, too.
But, a lot can happen between now and the actual election - heck, something could happen before the primary.
2007-08-03 18:51:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Lord I hope not.
If you want more of the same, vote for Clinton.
We need an honest, forthright president with only the best interests of the American people at heart. Clinton doesnt qualify.
http://www.Gravel2008.us
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQvYR6UgAo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PU9Lm6V1rc
2007-08-04 17:04:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jesus W. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES!!! I really hope she wins and i think her being a woman has nothing to do with it she is more than qualified and she would be a hell of a president hopefully when she wins our economy will not be as screwed up as it is now!!!
If she doesnt win its because of sexist ignorant Americans pigs who still live in the 1800's
2007-08-03 19:59:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by sexxyboy09 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
I have not made up my mind yet, but as of now, who else do we have? really. Giuliani is a loose canon. McCain has lost his panache. Obama is green as green can be and is shooting himself in the foot as days go by. Edwards I like him but he seems to only focus on social issues we need someone that has strong social issues along with a great foreign policy. Lets not forget one thing, as much as people hate Clinton for his scandal his overall rating is the highest ever as a president. The possibility of him being a foreign envoy, Hillary already knowing the ropes and the main people ruling the world's nations along with her own ideas make her a hell of a candidate.
to answer one other person response America is OVERDUE for a female president.
2007-08-03 19:01:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by caliguy_30 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
>>>>>>Clinton's communications Director George Stephanopoulos Does Not Disclose Hillary Clinton Conflict Of Interest In WP/ABC Iowa Poll That Ranked Ron Paul Second To Last
______________________________
From Washington Post:
______________________________
Washington Post-ABC News Poll-The Washington Post-Sunday, August 5, 2007
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp...ml? hpid=topnews
This Washington Post-ABC News poll was conducted by telephone July 26-31, 2007, among a random sample of 402 Iowans likely to vote in the Republican caucus. The results have an five percentage point margin of sampling error. Sampling, data collection and tabulation by TNS of Horsham, Pa. and J. Ann Selzer of Selzer & Company, Inc. of Des Moines, Iowa consulted on this project.
______________________________
Selzer and Company Lists Wal-Mart as one of their top customers and promotes that they use "art" as well as facts when creating polls.
______________________________
J. Ann Selzer of Selzer & Company, Inc.
http://www.selzerco.com/
Naturally, quality public opinion research is scientific. It is precisely measured, accurately tabulated, and meticulously reported. That's where many research companies stop. They ask the questions and give their clients the numbers. Period. That's not enough. You need insights and ideas you can use. That's where the art comes in.
Clients Include: Wal-Mart, Grace A. Dow Memorial Library of Michigan, American Press Institute.
______________________________
Hillary Clinton Served On Wal-Mart Board Of Directors For 6 Years.
______________________________
Hillary Rodham Clinton served on the Board of Directors at Wal-Mart for a Six-year tenure
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/2...f3a9c40& ei=5070
______________________________
Clinton's communications Director George Stephanopoulos Never Disclosed This Relationship And Obvious Conflict Of Interest.
This shows that not only is Hillary Clinton have the capability to be connected to companies that can manipulate elections on various levels, she audaciously does not disclose these connections. Reminds me of Bush, Arbusto, and Bin Laden.
______________________________
Because of Ron Paul's consistent stand on the Iraq war [the largest issue facing Americans], he has been seen as the only GOP candidate that can beat front runner Hillary Clinton.
______________________________
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ arti...07candefeat.htm
http://www.gambling911.com/Onlin...aul- 052207.html
http://www.godlikeproductions.co...=8/3/07& forum=1
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/a.../25/ 289229.aspx
http://www.buchanan.org/blog/?p=787
http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au...ent/2007/06/12/
http://groups.google.com/group/a...1fe3f1? lnk=raot
______________________________
This answers any question of motif as to why Hillary would hide conflicts of interest between her and the Washington Post/ABC Iowa Poll that was used to:
1]Present an image of who is in the upper and lower tier of GOP Presidential Candidates so that more attention by the audience is given to those at the supposed upper tier.
2]Somehow justify Clinton's communications Director George Stephanopoulos [another obvious conflict of interest-but a disclosed one] only allowing a total of 2 minutes to Dr. Ron Paul in a 90 minute debate. He even revealed to all the viewers that he controlled the "green light" which timed candidates responses.
______________________________
These obviously powerful and compelling methods of creating artificial barriers in the election process should be disclosed to the American people so that our entire presidential election process is not compromised further than we have seen in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006. To see clearly whether or not we are living under a totalitarian dictatorship, this might be the first place to investigate
2007-08-06 12:39:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by informed 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not in this lifetime.
Too many people, even democrats and women just don't trust her. She's more power hungry than Bush and her husband put together. (and that's saying alot.)
If she wins the nomination, which she might, it will polarize every conservative, christian, traditionalist, and republican in the country to get out and vote. She will lose by a landslide.
2007-08-03 19:09:04
·
answer #11
·
answered by edisonguy05 2
·
2⤊
2⤋