does this guy want to start WWIII?

Question

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162795,00.html

so I guess if Christian or Jewish extremist attack us we should bomb Jerusalem? I think this guy is insane

I even found a fox news source so the conservatives couldn't complain about bias

Joseph, I think you are confused,
Mecca won't be attacking us, so why bomb them? IT would turn every Muslim in the world against us. my comment on Christian extremist was an analogy, and BTW No Christian extremists??? who marches at the funerals of Gay people and bombs abortion clinics? Take you're head out of the sand some time you might learn something.

oh I get it Joseph is a troll, it's so hard to tell them from the real republicans nowadays,

LIberals complaining should be sent to internment camps.

RESPONSE TO DETAIL: Here I answer you respectfully and with eloquence, and you accuse me of being a "troll."

lol a funny troll at that

man I hate to call you people thick but I will spell out my point since most of you seem to not get it, My argument isn't the use of nukes, it's the choice of target, why would you target a holy city in a country that did not attack us?

Answer 1

What a nut. In addition to being totally racist and and bigoted, it wouldn't do a damn thing to stop fundamentalist and violent Muslims from attacking anyone. It would just piss off the (real) Muslims who don't hate us yet.

Answer 2

To Joseph...wasn't Timothy McVeigh a Christian extremist when he bombed the federal building in OK City? The problem is that, with terrorists, we are not being attacked by a country, but by crazy, die for their religion, extremists. And they can come from any country, including the U.S.

Answer 3

So what is your point, that we shouldn't strike back if attacked?

Furthermore, there are NO "Christian or Jewish extremists" that would attack us. You are terribly confused like most liberals and you don't even understand who the enemy is.

The person you reference is completely correct, and the immediate target following another attack should be the Main Mosque, with an atomic bomb or higher. LIberals complaining should be sent to internment camps.

RESPONSE TO DETAIL: Here I answer you respectfully and with eloquence, and you accuse me of being a "troll." This is typical liberal behavior - name calling and insults when overcome in a debate with facts and reason.

Why don't you go back to class, boy, and receive more liberal brainwashing from your socialist teachers or professors? You're an example of why the minimum voting age exists (and it should probably be raised).

Answer 4

"We have an enemy with no uniform, no state, who looks like you and me and only emerges right before an attack. How do we go after someone like that?" Adams said.

"What is near and dear to them? They're willing to sacrifice everything in this world for the next one. What is the pressure point that would deter them from their murderous impulses?" he said.

Doesn't sound that crazy, particularly as he was talking about a hypothetical situation involving the use of multiple nuclear strikes against the United States by Islamic terrorists and asked to think of ways to respond.

You mean, out of "respect for a religion" you would remove nukes as an option, leaving our enemies free to use them with impunity?

Goodness, even with that attitude, why would you publicize it where your enemies could here (like Obama just did)? Why would you let them know that despite having a deterrent you WOULD NOT USE IT!

Talk about stupid strategies with people who've made clear, for many decades, that they want us dead.

It isn't about "Mecca" attacking us. It is a matter of deterrent.

Letting them know that Mecca is a possible target is a definite deterrent, whether we are actually going to do it or not.

I'll play you at poker, any day!

Answer 5

Just more useless saber rattling. The guy has a bad case of hoof in mouth.

Lets take his idea to it's foregone conclusion: A Militant Muslim terrorist organization smuggles a nuclear device into the US and detonates it.

So we turn around and drop a nuke on Mecca?

Answer 6

History record shows that bad Christian leaders started most of the world wars: The Crusades: 30 years Christian wars in Europe, Colonial wars ,WWI, WWII, Koria war, Vietnam war, The Cold war and Iraq war.

Answer 7

If they use nukes, we'll respond with nukes, whether Mecca or Medina or anywhere else. Then someone else will use nukes and than another one and on and on. The earth will look like the moon only much more radio active for an eon or two.

Answer 8

Well, what would you do? sit there and say "thank you sir! may I have another!?" Or go to the Middle East and say, "Can we talk about this?"

I don't think that would happen.

Hate to break it to you, but if a Nuclear bomb is detonated in the US by the Muslim Jihadists, WWIII is already on!

Answer 9

so we should just sit back if attacked and just lie down and accept defeat thats not how america oes things if u dont like it then leave but Im all for retaliation and its not about relgigion it's about the group that did it we dont attack musslims here in the US just al quada so get ur facts straight it's not going to start WW3 extremist groups arent countries their groups that cant make alot of countrites go to war agiasnt eachother

Answer 10

apparently a lot of people here see no problem with bombing someone that didn't bomb us, but then again they didn't mind attacking a country that didn't attack us first.