English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

26 answers

The last of the Bush supporters are hopeless, let it go.

2007-08-03 11:29:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9 7

conflict is justifiable in case you're protecting your self (as a result - your u . s . a .) so the authentic question comes right down to - are we protecting u . s . a . - the authentic answer is - NO That being suggested - shall we know the quagmire for what that's now - we are there - we are fightiing - and we've human beings loss of life there - what do we do approximately it? It doesnt be counted who helps whom at this factor or what the basis explanation for that's - the actuality that it exist and desires to be addressed is what counts - so how do we handle it?? the answer - carry them homestead the place they belong - the longer we are residing there the extra severe it receives - the extra our human beings will die - the extra the exterior worldwide will hate us - the extra we grow to be in touch with the failings happening over the - in basic terms carry them homestead and all those issues disappear Jeeper-Creeper: Congress exceeded a decision yet did no longer save on with the form - so - in result we broke our rules - Cngress, in accordance to the form, is the only team who has the authority to declare conflict on yet another countyr AND that became no longer completed going into Afganistan or Iraq - in spite of what decision they exceeded conflict became on no account declared As for anybody else stupid adequate to have faith the conflict is justified - all bush did became replace the "chilly conflict" with the "conflict on terror". If this "conflict on terror" became a real conflict one million. what u . s . a . are we at conflict with? 2. how do all of us be conscious of as quickly as we win the conflict? 3. how do all of us be conscious of whilst the conflict is over? you will discover how that's an open ended conflict - in case you cant you will possibly desire to get some psychological glasses - there is not any thank you to win - by utilising putting forward a "conflict on terror" we've in certainty set ourselves as much as be the "worldwide police" - in case you dont see the inherent negative aspects in this you adult males are lots worse off then i theory.

2016-10-09 04:09:19 · answer #2 · answered by goulette 4 · 0 0

They dont believe that 3600 lives is a big number and are quite willing to let 3600 more die in order to feel safe. After all this is end of times Revelations we are dealing with..... at least thats what Bush believes.


Locutus, please name which terrorist organizations that Saddam was funding and training? Oh thats right the only Terrorists that we are fighting right now were created by the Cold War.


COLMORTIMER, who the **** said we hated our own soldiers? You backwards thinking hypocrite. It makes me sad to think how many great american boys and girls are dying over there. I appreciate that most of them believe they are protecting America. What we hate is the lying politicians that sent them to their deaths. And by the way your link is nothing but hateful bashing of liberals. Best way to tell who is losing an arguement is when the insults start flying.

2007-08-03 11:35:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

No. Not you did this. We did not do our due diligence of course, but Bush stole his two elections, and, we allowed it, and have not insisted, in big and noisy numbers, for an impeachment. And, the congress has not listened to one work from anyone of the millions who have asked them to impeach this president. Now that the Democrats are in control, the give him an over 90% approval rating? Run for office legal and citizens of the country who have heritage here, we are in trouble.

2007-08-03 11:35:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Yeah don't look at me bud I didn't vote for him. Knew this was going to happen before we ever invaded.

And question why did we invade? Said it was because he was helping Al Qaeda right? Well if he was helping them how come they had tried to assassinate him several times.
Question whey did we invade? Said he had weapons of mass destruction . Well the Israeli's had destroyed his nuclear faculty and it had never been rebuilt.
Question Why did we invade? Said he had chemical weapons. Of course he had nerve gas and mustard gas. Hell we give it to him during the Iran Iraqi war. He'd already used most of it.
So why did we really invade? The Shieks of the United Arab Emigrate ordered him to maybe so they could get the oil.
Or was it the King of Saudi Arabia that ordered him to invade so he could get the oil.
Or was it the King of Kuwaitt that ordered him to invade because Saddam owed him money and he wanted the oil?
Or was it maybe the King of Jordan who ordered him to invade because he wanted the oil.
Or did they all get together and all together order him to invade?
Or did they all order his daddy (who is also their lackey enunch slave) to order him to invade.
Needless to say we will never find out in our life time. And you can bet it will never be in American history books.either.

2007-08-03 11:45:22 · answer #5 · answered by JUAN FRAN$$$ 7 · 4 3

Is the blood of 3 million Cambodians of the hands of those who forced the US to withdraw from 'Nam too early?

Will the bood of tens of millions that will be slaughtered by the radical muslims be on your hands?

Is the blood of millions of babies on the hands of the so-called "pro-choice" crowd?

Since you probably voted for Clinton, you, by your own "logic", helped kill millions in Rwanda and Bosnia, as well as 3000 on 9-11.

Note: I don't believe that you are, but I'm just using your own reasoning.

2007-08-03 11:34:40 · answer #6 · answered by Dee B 4 · 4 5

Is the blood of 50,000+ US citizens killed in auto accidents last year, at the hands of drunk drivers not enough to make them regret their mistake.

NOPE.
Fact of life...Deal with it.

2007-08-03 12:31:25 · answer #7 · answered by hoovarted 7 · 2 3

Bush hasn't admitted he screwed up, I doubt his supporters will either. It's frightening that no one, not even the president, can tell us when we're going to be able to bring our troops home. He promised us it would only take a few months...

2007-08-03 11:31:10 · answer #8 · answered by katydid 7 · 7 5

no, but does provide people such as yourself a sense of confidence in your Bush bashing anti-war rants, and that's OK. I don't mind.

2007-08-03 11:43:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Not in the least....these hypocrites say it's the fault of Bill Clinton, Bugs Bunny, Homer, anybody but the warmongers that thought they could walk into Iraq and walk straight out again.

2007-08-03 11:32:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 6

For warmongers it is never enough, but pls don't forget the lose of lives of many more civilians....

2007-08-03 11:42:50 · answer #11 · answered by me 6 · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers