In the old days, our government was designed to consist of a balance of powers, in a system known as "checks and balances." The president has seen fit to eliminate these checks through his use of signing statements. President Bush has written more signing statements than all previous US presidents combined.
President Clinton issued 140 signing statements, frequently acknowledging the crafters of the bills he signed, or perhaps how he intended to enforce them. President George H. W. Bush issued 232 signing statements during his 4 year term. When congress passed a law reiterating America's opposition to the use of torture, President Bush included a statement exempting himself and the executive branch from its purview.
Is it time our civics textbooks were rewritten to reflect this new reality?
2007-08-03
11:15:05
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Chuck, that's clever. Blaming Clinton, who twice tried to kill or capture Osama bin Laden, for our unprovoked war in Iraq. President Bush, on the other hand, has now TWICE allowed Osama to escape unscathed. Why is that?
And why don't conservatives ever think to blame the first WTC attack on George H. W. Bush, since it occurred a mere 38 days into Clinton's term in office, instead of nine months? Besides, members of Clinton's administration made valiant efforts to warn Bush of the threat Osama posed--to no avail. Bush preferred to continue one of the longest vacations of any sitting US president the months before the attack, and now faults Iraq's parliament for deigning to take shorter vacations than his.
2007-08-03
12:21:05 ·
update #1