No...don't think so. But who really knows?
BH's are simply points of such great gravitational pull that stuff goes into a point and never comes back out. Energy and mass, makes no difference; they go in, but, generally speaking, not back out.
But the Hawking radiation, quantum energy leaving a BH has been postulated; so some stuff may in fact emerge. But, and this is a big BUT, Hawking radiation comes back into our known universe, not into some other universe, and it is just stuff mass/energy that was sucked into the BH from our universe in the first place. I don't think that constitutes "recycling" in the sense you meant.
The worms holes I know about [See source.] cross through, but do not enter into, a time-space outside our known universe. But they emerge, some time-space away from the origin, back into our known universe. Thus, there again, this is not so much recycling, but simply moving mass-energy from one time-space to another in our own universe.
Some lesser regarded papers suggest "white holes". These, according to their WAGs, are emitters of mass-energy rather than suckers of it like black holes. But, thus far, no one has found even a hint of white holes.
On the other hand, there is strong evidence that most, if not all, galaxies have black holes in their middles. That makes sense to me as there is a heck of a lot of mass in the middle of a typical galaxy. That some of that mass should collapse to form a black hole under their aggregate forces of gravity seems quite feasible.
There is one theory that posits that our own universe is but the inside of a black hole. Think about it, there is a lot of mass in our universe when you add in the so-called dark mass/energy, which makes up around 96% of all mass energy in the universe. Why would this enourmous mass not cause a black hole in whatever is outside our universe...if anything?
2007-08-03 11:09:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by oldprof 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It just a model but the universe must recycle even if some other process is used. The model now in favor has blackholes as an end all process but some people say the hole evaporates. My own impression is that recycling will become favored in time though how its done is still going to be a mystery. The Big Bang model will fade from the scene as recycling comes in.
2007-08-03 11:00:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by jim m 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The article below discusses a model of conservation of energy between the two sides of the Black Hole's Event Horizon.
I consider the other side of the E.H. to be another universe, typically referred to as the Imaginary Universe; most things there vibrate or travel faster than light. The big article on the website listed below discusses how the Imaginary Universe interacts with our Real Universe, but the article expresses a heretical viewpoint, for now.
2007-08-03 12:29:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by science_joe_2000 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bingo! it is precisely what black holes do, they only recycle superfluous celestial remember and ability. Black holes do not explode, although that's conceivable for them to implode. If one ever does implode it could only disappear, ultimate over at that component of the textile of area. a results of the enclosure may be a rippling rigidity wave that radiates outward from all course from the component the place the black hollow seals close. Like while a floor decrease or wound heals. Black holes devour remember alongside their own orbit interior galaxies.
2016-11-11 03:36:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Plasma theory? I can't remember. But the answer is no.
2007-08-03 11:06:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Aaron H 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
they are those super nasty chicks that walk around d avenue all nite long!
2007-08-03 10:48:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋