Have THINGS changed that much SINCE 2004?

Question

In 2004, Democrats were playing up John Kerry's military service and his 20 years in the Senate. Kerry, as an officer actually was in charge of people. He had leadership responsibilities. Like a CEO or Governor or Mayor would have? These people have has to make decisions at the highest level. They have led organizations, been in charge!

What will the democrats talk about if Hillary or Obama is the nominee?

Basically they are reduced to;

"They qualify under the constitution."

Whoopee! So does Caveman in the Geico commercial....

Answer 1

It has never been proven that the Geico Caveman was born in the USA and qualifies to be president under the constitution.

Answer 2

I reckon his current persona is just fine.His character has been constantly evolving & The Deadman 07 is just the latest version.Sure the Ministry era was maybe his best.But the storyliners won't repeat history just for the sake of it. Besides Chuck Palumbo has his biker gimmick now & Edge has just started his Rated R Faction, so the big stable on SD looks to be Edge's.

Answer 3

Um... The Cavenman in the Geico commercial?

I know you haven't gotten that degree yet, so I'll forgive you from not knowing who can be president, according to the constitution.

But the cavemen couldn't be president because he's not real.

Answer 4

Even though I dislike John Kerry, he's a stand-up politician far more qualified than any other democratic name on the list.

Answer 5

I think the message I am getting from the left on why we should vote for either one, is that they are members of an underrepresented group (Minority), and if we elect them, it would prove were not racist.

Of course so does voting for a Geico Caveman as President. SO MG, if you run, I'll pick vote for you over either Hillary or Obama.

EDit>> Ignore Conservative Lib, Your Cute. I think he has issues of his own masculinity.

Answer 6

The Demagogues have no one to blame but themselves. After all, their ill-advised platforms and chosen leaders who support said platforms have left the former "people's" party with absolutely NO electable candidates on the national stage.
At least they used to actually stand for the regular, working guy; they played the averages and it kept them in power for 40 years. Now they tout gay rights, higher taxes, intrusive government, "talking" to terrorists, abortion, radio censorship, "sham-nesty," domestic land-grabbing ( a.k.a. eminent domain,) "Islam is peace" and socialized medicine.
What does the normal, working American demographic care for any of these?
J.F.K. is rolling over in his grave.

Answer 7

All I hear is the cry for a change of direction. So I'm guessing Iraqi's will be seeing the backside of our soldiers fleeing their country if one of those two take charge.

Answer 8

for Hillary they would attempt to use her experience as the first lady and senator , although I am not aware of her accomplishments besides failing to get national health care started in the 90's , surely she has something they can put a spin on

the only thing ossama bin hussein has is the fresh face trick , the "new America" or the " no Bush and Cheney light" . He has no accomplishments besides having an excellent background and knowledge of socialism , if you consider socialism and the enemy's religion excellent

Answer 9

The ENTIRE republocratic party is or is becoming hard to distinquish between. My suggestion is vote for Rob Paul & support our Libertarian party. Check both out on line & say good by to the politicians(puppeteers!) of THE demo/repubie party!

Answer 10

That depends. Do you think Americans will fall for the same trick, two leap years in a row? "Vote Republican, or you'll all be forced to marry an Illegal Gay Mexican Terrorist! OOOooooOOOOhhhhhh!!!!!" (that last bit was spooky ghost noises a la Jacob Marley)