Did you know that 1 + 1 does not always equal 2?

Question

In the set of real numbers 1 + 1 always equals 2,
but in the set {0,1}, 1 +1 = 0

(ring theory in Mathematics)

I'm just tired of people thinking that 2 is always the correct answer, like some of the people who answered this question.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ahs3DHW82wRfjJ.ila3ivuKGxQt.?qid=20070803130838AAfwEE5

Answer 1

You say the AT&T commercials, 1+1 = 1.

AT&T Motto: "Weeee'rrree BAAaack"

Over finite fields, GF(2), 1 + 1 = 0

Lexapro man.

Answer 2

First of alld192e0c4ad64a9c35fe32972477e4cd8 the people who reported no longer necessarilyd192e0c4ad64a9c35fe32972477e4cd8 yet in maths it is likewise are incorrect. It somewhat relies upon. good examples of this became that 0,a million + 0,a million = d192e0c4ad64a9c35fe32972477e4cd8d192e0c4ad64a9c35fe32972477e4cd8 interior the binary variety equipment. It relies upon additionally while you're pondering a definite container. for instance the sector F2 is made up of purely [d192e0c4ad64a9c35fe32972477e4cd8d192e0c4ad64a9c35fe32972477e4cd8d192e0c4ad64a9c35fe32972477e4cd8] once you upload 0,a million and nil,a million you surely do get 0,a million. because of the reality that is worthwhile to evaluate 2mod2 in this situation.

Answer 3

The whole does not always equal to the sum of its parts. A classic example is two people getting together, ie 1+1. ....oftentimes equals 3 or more depending on the number of kids they have.

Answer 4

And I thought 1+1 is 10
but I work in binary

Answer 5

A better theory is:-
1) Simon + 2) Garfunkel. = 100%

Answer 6

It's just the dual calculating system.
It's the same way as every computer calculates.

Answer 7

is that supposed to be a simple matrix or something?
like using the first number plus the first number?

Answer 8

Did you know you just wasted like 5 points on a useless question??? Lol

Answer 9

Nope, didn't know that.