Fox went to court to obtain the right to lie and an appeals court upheld that right in a case involving two Fox reporters who wanted to tell the truth but were prohibited from doing so by their employer, Fox. Case involves reporters Akre and Wilson, look it up. Why is it important that Fox be granted the right to lie on their newscasts? Why would they even want that? Do you feel comfortable knowing that Fox thought it was important to establish the legal right to lie to you, their audience? Maybe there is a good side to this, I'd like to hear it, if there is one. Thanks!
2007-08-03
08:17:24
·
9 answers
·
asked by
jxt299
7
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism
It had to do with reporters wanting to tell viewers that a hormone was banned in Europe because it causes cancer, and not being allowed to by their employers. The courts stand up for cancer. Compassionate conservatism.
2007-08-03
09:58:50 ·
update #1
So just to be clear, you folks who are standing up for Fox's right to lie are fine in this case with not being told that a product you might be using can give you cancer. Is that correct?
2007-08-03
20:58:11 ·
update #2