For the pentagon 9-11 footage question.?

Question

All I'm asking is why the Pentagon is not showing us what happened.

I'm not asking about what you saw or what did or did not hit the building. I certainly never said I love Clinton.

I am asking WHY THE US GOVERNMENT IS NOT LETTING US KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PENTAGON ON 9-11 VIA THE FOOTAGE THAT THEY OBVIOUSLY HAVE?

Can anyone actually stick to that question.

Answer 1

The 9/11 commission has issued a report. You choose to ignore it. They have released the tape from the Pentagon parking lot showing several seconds before the explosion. Even the idiot conspiracy sites have that one. They can NOT release any of the other tapes from the gas station or the department of highways because they don't own the tape.

Answer 2

There is one video that was released that shows some kind of aircraft passing behind a "Call Box", just before it struck the Pentagon. a large rudder fin can be seen protruding from the top of the "Call box" as well as an exhaust trail. Based on geometric calculations this aircraft is only about 85 feet long, too short to be a Boeing 757, which is 155 feet long. Based on this evidence, it would seem are government is hiding the truth about what hit the Pentagon.

This video, obtained by a public interest group, shows the rudder of the hidden aircraft, just before impact. See frame = 00:25.
http://www.clipaday.com/2006/05/pentagon_plane_crash_from_sept.html

Why would our government hide the truth ? More than likely, members of our government were the true culprits of the attack. Our government is in the control of a strange and powerful force and it is NOT the people they are ment to serve.

Answer 3

Obviously have? I am sorry, but what do you mean obviously have? Do you have proof that cameras were pointed at that part of the building?

Don't just say, "well duh, they must have cameras all over every square inch of the place". You would need to find out if there were actually cameras.

Demanding that the government turn over something you cannot even prove the existance of is something that you are using to put yourself in a non-lose position

A. The government does not have the tape because it does not exist. You win.

B. The government does have a tape and turns it over. You win.

Really, how would you be proven wrong about this if you demand that the existance of these tapes is real if you don't have any proof to back it up. What is next, demanding that the government turn over all of the video taken by the super secret spy satelites so you can find out what happend on 9/11?

Answer 4

Its all on a need to know basis.

Lets just say, theoretically, it was a missile that actually hit the Pentagon, not a plane. The government then traced it's origin to a powerful country (China, N. Korea, Russia, ect.). Can you imagine the reprocussions of that? There would be mass chaos, World War 3 by which the likes we have never seen.

A person is smart, but people are stupid. If this scenario was the case, then its in the best interest of the government to keep the video locked away.

Answer 5

I have seen footage from a security gate. And maybe there are national scurity concerns that could be exposed with these cameras. Most if not all of the offices in the Pentagon don't even allow its employees to have camera phones. So if an employee with security clearance can't have a camera phone are they going to release secuirty camera footage.

Answer 6

The pentagon doesn't exist, we never landed on the moon and 9/11 was a cruel hoax...

Further the I-35 bridge was actually made in China with Mexican labor.

Answer 7

Wouldn't you think the Pentagon would have the most high tech surveillance system in the world?

Why did the FBI confiscate the tapes across the street from the gas station and hotel?

911 was an inside job....

Here is all the proof you need people...take a look....
http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oGkwW4erNGWxsBKiZXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTExY281YmEwBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA3NrMQR2dGlkAwRsA1dTMQ--/SIG=11eu7693p/EXP=1186253880/**http%3a//www.physics911.net/

Answer 8

How do you know that they "obviously" have footage? Like what?

What tends to happen with this is that people like yourself get on here and talk about what we DON'T have as evidence, and completely ignore the mountain of evidence that does show what happened, such as the dozens of pictures of jet plane wreckage at the site, hundreds of eye-witnesses who saw it, and the families of the passengers that died.

Answer 9

It's kind of common for evidences to be locked up in some federal investigations. Is that footage the only evidence not handed out to public?

http://usinfo.state.gov/media/misinformation.html

Answer 10

If there is video footage, it doesn't matter. We have all seen the aircraft wreckage. We know what happened.

So, assuming there is some unshown video footage, playing it would only satisfy voyeuristic curiosity. It would not prove anything more than has already been proven.