How is Rush and O'Reilly going to spin the reappropriations BIll veto from the MN Governor (R)? Will the GOP pay to dig out all of the lost victims from under the 35 bridge in the river so they can get a decent burial?
2007-08-03 07:29:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nice looking out Neocons!!!
2007-08-03 07:31:54 · update #1
Well since they both carry a copy of the Neo-Con playbook instead of a bible. It will be no problem at all. They will go to the chapter about re-appropriation spinning and select one of the many confusing passages to confuse their mindless, soulless followers. As far as the GOP paying for decent burials of the victims, I think that money is still earmarked for the war in Iraq.
2007-08-03 07:48:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
I find it borderline sickening that some are making this into a partisan issue already. I think both sides need to accept blame for ignoring our infrastructure needs for too many years.
For example, this bridge was rated "structurally deficient" in 1990. This means it has been deficient through 3 presidents from both parties and 4 governors from 3 different parties. Sounds like both sides to admit they are the problem and they need to start dealing with problems.
2007-08-03 14:35:20 · answer #2 · answered by The Stylish One 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If it is going to take money out of their money chest , he will veto stating , "We can't give them money for their disaster because it would show favoritism against New Orleans". We just can't do that now, Karl , so just bring my pen and I'll tell what to write and you write it out for me and I'll give it a little lopsided ink swing mark and you send it back to the people and "Keep your damn mouth shut to old Bob Novak, I don't like anymore he is a tattle tale". Mama told me to not tell old Novak anything else because he is kicked out of our secrets, okay Karl.
2007-08-03 14:41:51 · answer #3 · answered by Nicki 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Are you seriously trying say that Bush is responsible for a bridge collapsing in MN? Liberals have completely lost their minds.
2007-08-03 14:32:30 · answer #4 · answered by tigrompy 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Not "executive privilege" but yes, the president has an absolute legal right to veto any legislation he doesn't like.
Legal, but stupid.
2007-08-03 14:32:09 · answer #5 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The federal government shouldn't be paying for bridges in the first place.
2007-08-03 14:34:55 · answer #6 · answered by areallthenamestaken 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
He has the power to do it, so yes, it's a part of his executive privileges. There is a lot more to the story than you're telling, also, so who is the spinner, and who is concealing all of the truth? Might that be you?
2007-08-03 14:33:52 · answer #7 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
rush,o'reilly,Mn,Mi,governor,bush,gop,EO?how in the world do these all come together to make any sense?
2007-08-03 14:34:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
who would do such a thing,,,and put people,s lives at risk?
2007-08-03 14:34:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋