English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

nope...it just sounds more like another case of mis-appropriated funds...

2007-08-03 06:12:39 · answer #1 · answered by elchavoguapo 6 · 0 0

We should have the money, but Bush had to have his meaningless war and Cheney had to stuff the pockets of his former employer ( could there be a kick back there?). The Interstate bridge that fell 35W was built the same year as the Silver Bridge crossing the Ohio, which was on U.S. Route 35 killing 47 people. Should that not have been a lesson way back then?

2007-08-03 13:20:22 · answer #2 · answered by Mountain Man 4 · 0 0

The infrastructure of our nation...roads, bridges, etc....takes a fortune to update and maintain. Most states don't have enough money to take care of pressing needs...and fixing up what is lacking takes a back burner. It's a sad statement and the collapse may have gotten the attention focused where it needs to be.

2007-08-03 13:12:26 · answer #3 · answered by DinahLynne 6 · 0 0

It means that every state has a government within itself, and the budget that is set aside for things like bridge repair, is too small, or they must take it from another source, which leaves that source short...It all comes from taxes, and revenue,,,people don't want higher taxes, ergo..the budget is set too small for all states needs..

2007-08-03 13:15:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It means that there just isn't enough kickback money for everyone.

2007-08-03 13:12:38 · answer #5 · answered by Iggy 7 · 0 0

MEANS THE LEADERS HAVE FAT POCKET

2007-08-03 13:12:11 · answer #6 · answered by jimmiejet 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers