You can never eliminate 100% of it, but it could be severely diminished by the following means, I think.
1- Abolish PACs.
2- Term limits for Congress.
3- The fair tax.
4- Abolish lobbyists.
Of course, none of that will become law anytime soon unless we the people demand it.
And if enough ppl will get out of their Paris, Lindsay, Britney stupor, we have a chance.
2007-08-03 07:42:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by mikey 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Huh?!? What do you advise?!? State governments will end the country's corruption?!? as though corruption in basic terms exists interior the federal government? If states had greater skill than they presently do, then states will alter corruption interior the federal government? What you stated makes actual no experience. William H. Taft as quickly as stated for you to not merely write so as which you would be understand, you're able to write so as which you won't have the capacity to be misunderstood. you're able to offer it a attempt.
2016-10-19 09:04:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get the big money out of D.C. and back to the states, where it belongs.
It is marginally easier to monitor state and local politicians than it is to monitor federal politicians. Its also much easier for the federal government to play into wars that work against us and make decisions that can negatively affect the entire 300,000,00 at once.
Texas can be Texas and California can be California - instead of trying to make them the same, why not let them be what they are?
2007-08-03 06:07:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by freedom first 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not until politicians are forbidden to take campaign donations from anyone and all are provided with an equal campaign budget. Even then this won't end corruption.
Look at the tiniest town council in tinytown USA and you will find corruption.
2007-08-03 06:07:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The biggest things are to require transparency. Secrecy permits and encourages corruption. Every use of power invested in an individual should be fully documented. Judges write opinions supporting their rulings, for example. If a legislator wants to put in an earmark, he or she should be proud of the deed.
See www.transparency.org
2007-08-03 06:09:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by John T 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
We vote out all incumbents, over and over again. We do not let them hold office long enough to "payback" the special interest groups. They would quickly learn that they are losing millions in their lobby efforts because the American people will just vote out "their candidate" in the next election. It would be a silent revolt, done at the ballot box.
2007-08-03 06:07:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by libsticker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's going to take more than voting someone into office that we think is going to change things for us.
No matter who we put up there, they will have their minds altered by the many we did not get to replace. If they don't get on board and go with the flow they'll find themselves out of there. Some how they will be forced out.
2007-08-03 06:52:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by From Yours Trully 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
So, do the people you vote for get elected?
Do you only pay attention when they get caught or are you involved along the way? May not help in DC, but it does at the local level.
2007-08-03 06:06:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by madjer21755 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do what China did to the head of their Food and Drug administration who got caught taking kickbacks to allows unsafe drugs into the market.....They shot the SOB in the head.
2007-08-03 06:12:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by bukroo_banzai 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Eliminate earmarks. Eliminate corporate funding of campaigns. Regulate all television exposure of the candidates - make it equal.
2007-08-03 06:07:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by El Duderino 4
·
0⤊
0⤋