Any Other Libs Disappointed that Pelosi & Hillary Haven't Legalized Pot?

Question

I'm disappointed in the Dems.

Why haven't they done the right thing and legalize pot? Shouldn't it be my right to smoke whatever I want?

Why have the Dems let us down?

Pelosi and the Dems haven't even tried to send a bill that legalizes pot to Bush. Does this mean we live in a dictatorship?

Answer 1

I am very disappointed.

Hold on.......I need to reload the bong.

Answer 2

Le'ts get this on the instant Congress permit the the attack weapons ban expire September 13, 2004- who grew to become into in can charge of Congress- REPUBLICANS!!! TWIT!!! basically finding for an excuse in charge the Dems for some thing. i'm stunned you haven't any longer blamed the Dems for the nor'easter that basically blew with the aid of. In any journey, if the act were renewed (which grew to become into incredibly uncertain), President Bush could have probable used his veto pen two times rather of as quickly as. it could have in positive condition the mould. He talks approximately preserving existence, yet he vetoed the stem cellular analyze investment invoice which could help shelter existence and he would have vetoed that invoice which could have helped shelter existence besides. In any journey, the preliminary invoice grew to become right into a try invoice to verify IF there were any genuine effect. It proved it did no longer. There could have had to be adjustments to develop the variety of the varieties of weapons banned In February 2007 a invoice, HR1022, subsidized with the help of representative Carolyn McCarthy of long island that could have reinstituted and amplify the ban on attack weapons. it could have decreased the form of necessities to be certain that a firearm to be categorised as an attack weapon from 2 to one. The ban did no longer be stated with the help of a Senate committee on March sixteen 2007. As of April seventh 2007, 33 cosponsors have signed on. it particularly is presently stalled in the abode Judiciary committee.

Answer 3

I am a classical liberal and have no faith whatsoever in modern liberals when it comes to human liberty.

There should be no law preventing a person from smoking pot. I have no desire whatsoever to smoke it, but it is not the government's place to tell me that I can't.

Such idiotic laws give a whole new meaning to the term...'reefer madness'. It's the same kind of nanny-state zealotry that brought us prohibition of 'demon rum'.

Please Note: I do not advocate or recommend breaking the law as it stands. Doing so marginalizes any effort to reform it.

Answer 4

I heard that Congress put it to a vote, but Pelosi and Hillary were too busy smoking a blunt to show up.

Answer 5

What disappoints liberals more than that is the fact that the Democrats have refused to impeach a clearly criminal president and stop an illegal and immoral war.

Answer 6

I am a Conservative, and I am disappointed that pot isn't legal, even though I don't smoke it.

Answer 7

Nope. They haven't let me down. If they should ever desire to legalize pot, I'll think its time to change parties.

Answer 8

I love how drugheads rationalize anything to make their case for using drugs seem more...acceptable. But then again, I understand that druggies are weak, immoral, unhealthy beings...I used to be one, 26 yrs ago, before I sobered/straightened up.

Answer 9

We know you are a republican

as with MOST people

we know pot is a trivial matter and should be decriminalized

Answer 10

They better damn well get crackin' on this.

If people aren't thoroughly stoned come election time they'll be screwed!

Answer 11

I cry every night