They want people that refer to them as feminazis to all look like Rush Limbaugh. Oh snap! The already do.
2007-08-03 05:20:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Deirdre O 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Why does it matter what feminazis want? They will all die unmarried and childless anyway, because they are so fat and hideous that no man would want to be seen in public with any of them. There are also people in this world that believe in UFOs even though there is no proof that UFOs from other planets are real, but they will die believing in UFOs. Do you sit and worry about what they will think if you say that you don't believe in UFOs? I don't. Not all women are "feminazis". Not all men are "girlie men". There are still a lot of heterosexual people living on this earth. Rosie O'Donnell and Boy George can rant and rave all day about how they despise heterosexuals, but there will always be more straight people than gay people.
2007-08-06 22:53:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Granted, I'm not what you would characterize as a "feminazi", but here's my take. Feminists want women to look like whoever they want to look like. To each his own.
My take on your comments though, are:
1. Hairy legs = masculinity, hence I shave my legs.
2. Short hair - I had short hair as a child, and my way of "rebelling" against my past is to have long hair.
3. You can't turn a may gay. He's either born that way or not.
4. A flat stomach is an ever-elusive goal, in spite of doing sit ups every day. I think men and women can relate to this.
5. I have makeup and high heels on now. I don't always, though.
And who said feminists wanted to look and act like men?
Relax and enjoy your Friday!
2007-08-03 15:16:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rainbow 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hahah...Feminazis? I guess you don't like feminists. Feminism seems to be a dirty, bad word to many people. I believe in feminism, my definition being women should be treated equally but not superior to men. Besides who doesn't want equality and respect. I'm not sure about feminists, I think they can be a bit extreme but I think many women who believe in their ideals also take pride in their appearance. I don't see whats wrong with believing in equality while still taking care of yourself. I shave my legs, have long hair, wear a bit makeup. If a woman chooses not to then it's her choice and really you shouldn't care so much about what other people do, especially if it doesn't affect you.
2007-08-03 23:19:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by caroline 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't care how women look, as long as they look the way they want to. I don't see what shaving, hair style, muscles or makeup have to do with being a woman.
I don't care how men look either, I personally like long hair and kilts on men, and if they want to shave, not have muscles and wear makeup, that's ok with me too, as long as that's what they want to do.
But I think high heels suck for both genders--I know of lots of women getting foot surgery because of them.
You're doing a disservice to victims of the nazi's by associating them with feminists--feminists haven't built concentration camps, slave labor camps and exterminated millions of people. As a matter of fact, Nazi's exterminated feminists, too, not anti-feminists.
2007-08-04 00:01:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by edith clarke 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, they don't want to look like men. They are just sick and tired of being told by men how women are supposed to look.
1. Why should just women shave their legs? Why not both sexes nor neither? Men invented the idea and expectation that women need to do so. Go to parts of Europe and the Middle East, and women don't shave their legs there. It is not in their culture. Are they any less than women for not doing so? No.
2. Short hair has nothing to do with wanting to be a man. The hippies of the '60s wore long hair but were not wanting to be women. Some women look better with short hair, and some even look sexy while bald. I would not suggest that you call women your mother's age lesbians because they wear variations of the pixie cut.
3. I don't think feminists have much to do with the fashion industry. It is mostly gay men projecting their feelings onto others. They try to make women into the objects of *their* attraction. They like men, and particularly youthful men, so that is how they try to make the haute-coutre models appear. That is an example of what happens when homocentric views enter the marketplace.
Btw, "tranny" or "trannie" is a hate slur against transsexuals. Most transsexuals don't have this stereotyped look. In fact, TSs are probably less likely to become feminists since they believe gender identity is inborn and not a construct. A number of the things women these days consider sexist, there are TSs who yearn for those very things and see modern women as giving up the best parts of being women.
4. Why shouldn't physical fitness be valued in both sexes, or does fit women somehow make you feel degraded and small?
5. Makeup and high heels are again, inventions of men. Why should women have to wear something invented by a man in order to be seen as attractive or even a woman at all?
---
You imply there is something wrong with women "acting" like men. Is the real problem that there is something wrong with being a man? Why should there be arbitrary and made up expectations for one gender and not the other? Even worse, why should men have ANY say over how women should act or dress, or vice-versa? It seems to me that if it is capable for a woman to act or dress a certain way, then she is acting like a woman. Likewise, if it is possible for a man to act/dress certain ways, then he is acting like a man. If men started spontaneously giving birth to babies, then that would be masculine behavior when they do it, but the male body is not made that way.
2007-08-03 12:29:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Feminazis, yes. Feminists, no. A feminist would recognize the physical differences between men and women and embrace them.
2007-08-03 12:38:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
In your opinion!
And that pretty girl in the picture, believe me she is not the only feminist who doesn't look like a trannie. (And help me out here...the only definition of trannie I know is transmission as in motor vehicle).
I think you just wanted to show this girl's pic and that is all.
As far as your other observations of feminism go, I can tell you are a young and inexperienced person. Once life adds a little salt and sage to your experiences, you will see feminism in a different light.
2007-08-03 12:04:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by bin there dun that 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
there are enough 'real' differences such as bone structure, facial hair and breasts. we don't need to make them up with clothes and shoes and hair length. viva la difference. but look at the REAL biological difference, not things people are adding on top.
2007-08-03 11:55:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sufi 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Women look gorgeous whatever they do. Some try to look unattractive, but they never succeed. What they do with their looks is their own business - they're certainly not trying to attract what's on offer around here, thats for sure.
2007-08-03 12:05:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋