English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I give up:
Ladainian Tomlinson (RB)
Matt Jones (WR)

I get:
Steven Jackson (RB)
Terrell Owens (WR)
Marques Colston (WR)

2007-08-03 04:24:56 · 17 answers · asked by Sensible Moderate 3 in Sports Fantasy Sports

17 answers

I'd hate to give up LT, but you did well for yourself in return.

First off, Matt Jones is a throwaway who is unlikely to ever produce first-round pick numbers. With Steven Jackson, you've got a top-tier back. He won't put up LT-type numbers, but he's among the first I'd choose once LT was off the board.

TO, as much as I dislike him, is an outstanding receiver who will put up big yardage and TD numbers. He has a good rapport with Romo, and I think he'll be ready to prove something this season. Colston won't repeat his numbers from last season, but he's a solid WR2 or WR3 option in that New Orleans offense.

I think you've quite clearly done well with this trade.

2007-08-03 04:30:07 · answer #1 · answered by Craig S 7 · 0 0

Crime of the century!

Did you point a gun at him?

You did very, very well on that trade. Matt Jones has been hurt, and is as of right now the #3 WR for JAX.

LT is LT, but Steven Jackson was incredible down the stretch last year. Throw in TO and Colston, and I think you have the balance to be THE early favorite for the championship if the rest of your team is decent. That's some serious touchdown production.

Now go grab Michael Turner and hope LT gets hurt.

Sick.

EDIT: And with due respect to anyone who will tell that LT can put you in the championship alone, he was dreadful last year during Week 16 of the fantasy playoffs. Matchups can make the difference, and Jackson has a weaker NFC schedule as a whole.

2007-08-03 04:28:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This is a pretty good trade for you because you are getting two good WR's who will finish in the top 15 in fantasy football this year. Lets start with Steven Jackson last year he led the RBs in most caught passes with 90 receptions. He fits in perfectly with the rams offense due to his speed and strength. This guy took almost every snap last year, a complete work horse.

Terrel Owens's biggest fantasy buzz in the offseason was getting rid of coach parcells. Whether TO gets along with his new head coach or not. This guy is going to have a solid year between 10-13 TDs.

Marques Colston is no fluke this guy missed nearly 3 games and was still able to finish with 8 TDs. During the second half of the season this guy was getting the "special treatment" from opposing defences. The double teams, defenders stacking up against him etc...Even if the defenders are able to stop him, his good hands and his strength will make him a solid WR. The explosive saints offense will only benefit Colston and boost up his numbers.

2007-08-03 06:02:24 · answer #3 · answered by Manaje 2 · 0 0

That's a very even trade. Steven Jackson should be productive, and you definitely upgraded your receiving corps. I think Matt Jones is a sleeper pick this season, while Marques Colston is a bust. He will do okay, but he will in no way reproduce his numbers from last year. The loss of Joe Horn and the almost inevitable "sophomore slump" sets in. Terrell Owens will be productive. I think it was a fairly good trade because you got the second best fantasy running back in the league and a consistent big name receiver.

2007-08-03 04:31:15 · answer #4 · answered by jdrichards1 3 · 0 0

Absolutely...LT to SJax is a downgrade, but TO and Colston are both top 10 WRs. I like this trade for you a lot. LT will be the best player in FF, barring major injury again this year...but Stephen Jackson should be 2nd or 3rd and not too far behind. However Matt Jones will be lucky to crack the top 30 for WRs. Nice trade!!

2007-08-03 04:36:56 · answer #5 · answered by Rich B 3 · 0 0

Yes. LT may be the best player but steven Jackson is too far bak. Matt Jones has done absoultely nothing while TO and Colston are proven players and good #1 or #2 guys.

2007-08-03 04:40:14 · answer #6 · answered by Cutler4pres 2 · 0 0

Wow... what a great dilemma. You are giving up a Fantasy Football God in LT but getting back three great players. It would be a great deal for you if he accept.

If i was the other guy, i don't think i would accept the deal. Although i am getting LT, i would be losing Steven Jackson, Owens and Colston. There is no way his other draft picks can help with LT's points.

2007-08-03 04:48:08 · answer #7 · answered by Thomas 5 · 0 0

I'm not sure I really like it. Having LT on your team usally means and automatic top 3 finish. TO will have a solid year but I don't think COlston will be able to produce as big numbers as he did last year. Overall, upgrade in WR but thats about it.

2007-08-03 04:28:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i'm getting: D. McNabb, J. Cutler, D. Clark, and Lendale White I supply: P. Manning, J. Garcia, A. Gates, V. Davis, and A. Randle El definitely i dont see any enhancements peyton is a few distance better than mcnabb possibly in the journey that your league is a keeper league you get an improve in cutler because of the fact ceremony now he's throwing too many interceptions for my broncos you gave up the main suitable tight lead to the league and the main suitable youg tight end for an usual te in clark randle el is definately better than lendale white white is not any longer the #a million returned yet he mite get some objective line incorporates so touchdowns could be effortless yet honetly i dont see why you standard that commerce properly it particularly is my opinion

2016-11-11 02:48:33 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

its not worth it L.T is the next best thing Matt Jones alright the only one that's worth it on the other side is Steven Jackson

2007-08-03 04:29:55 · answer #10 · answered by mike y 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers