It was 1990 when the federal government first issued an ominous label for Minnesota's busiest bridge: "structurally deficient." This from
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/03/national/main3130372.shtml
1990 was during the first Clinton era- NOT under Bush.
Yet, some people are hollering Bush did it.
When you make remarks like that, you show the world who you really are.
If ten thousand people believe a foolish notion, then ten thousand people are fools.
__________________________________
KrazyKyngeKorny(Krazy, not stupid)
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
2007-08-03 04:06:03 · 15 answers · asked by krazykyngekorny 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
>>George H. Bush was president in l990.<<
You are partially right. He also had a Democrap congress and could do NOTHING!. However, Dubby is NOT esponsible.
2007-08-03 13:19:04 · update #1
You know, any excuse at all to blame Bush. The liberals/democrats are getting more pathetic then usual.
2007-08-03 04:24:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A President cannot be expected to right all wrongs during his term of office. The Office of President is a continuous institution and criticism applies more to the Office than to the individual holding it. If Bush was aware of the problems with the bridge as he entered office, the responsibility is passed to him because he has assumed the Office of President and he is expected to take appropriate action.
2007-08-03 11:12:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I haven't looked at any of the other answers but you probably know by now that 1990 was Bush senior's term. You need to think before you call anyone a fool.
2007-08-03 11:23:10 · answer #3 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If people are actually blaming Bush for this they are stupid...I don't like Bush, but bad things happen regardless of who is in power
2007-08-03 11:09:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
George H. Bush was president in l990.
Seems like according to your logic - he is the one we should blame!
2007-08-03 11:13:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No politician is responsible. No one even knows what caused the bridge to collapse.
2007-08-03 11:09:36 · answer #6 · answered by regerugged 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
aren't the state or city governments far more responsible for their annual budgets than the President of the US?
2007-08-03 11:24:58 · answer #7 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush is in office for 7 years now. It is time to ask his administration questions why our infrastructure is falling apart.
2007-08-03 11:10:07 · answer #8 · answered by Viksicom 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
i'm a far-left liberal, and i don't think he had anything to do with it. just a sucky bridge. but if some made-up terrorist group claims responsibility, then i'll start to wonder.
2007-08-03 11:10:49 · answer #9 · answered by jimmy j 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
um Beavis, I hate Clinton and all, but he took office in January of '93.
2007-08-03 11:10:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋