English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

HArry CAn't possibly be with Ginny!That's like totally so upnoxious!If you think your on my side explain why and if your own those ppl who like the ending's side also explain why.if you just want to my a short answer...
on my side just type true it sucked
or
on their side type...It was totally awesome!!!!!!

2007-08-02 23:43:54 · 22 answers · asked by carlisle King 3 in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

TURTH IS HARRY AND GINNY ARE SO NOT A PAIR.THEY HARDLY HAVE ANYTHING IN COmmon!!!!they dont have any signs or things together!i bet jk rowling was browsing the websites and saw many ppl saying they should be together.i cant believe the name they names their own children!!!!

2007-08-02 23:53:55 · update #1

HArry should be with cho chang or hermione.tooo abd cho left and hermione was with(not spoiling) .he could have been with luna lovegood.

2007-08-03 00:12:23 · update #2

why i typed shan;t and obnoxious?cuz i was typign too fast ok?but seriously.she has no connection between harry.i won;t get over it.if you think i shouldn't be geting over it then dont answer me!blimey.i cant believe all thegood guys had died.potter should have died.not tonks lupin and dobby and especially fred!!maybe if percy died it would have been soo much better.

2007-08-03 13:54:37 · update #3

22 answers

3 words
actually five

Get the f*** over it!!

Listen big deal Harry is with Ginny. I've gotten over that months ago. Even though I still think the development was crappy I do agree that in the end it is canon.

Geez and they wonder why spoilers exist on the internet. It's times like these I wish that there were more people running around spoiling the book for shipping obsessed idiots like you.

Also I do think the word is obnoxious not upnoxious.

2007-08-02 23:54:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

I didn't mind the whole Harry/Ginny thing in the end, though I was never that big a fan of them.

I was more turned off by the epilogue all together . . . it was too sickeningly sweet for me, not just 'happy ending', but total overkill to drive the messages home. Could have done without it and just had the implied ending that he and she would be together and things would turn out well.

2007-08-05 22:26:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If JK Rowling was the kind of author who would write according to public opinions , She'd never kill off so many of people's favorite characters..
She just wants to present a good literary piece..
She had everything figured out right at the beginning...
Harry and Ginny being together is something she chose to make happen..
And being the AUTHOR of the series, I think she had every right to..

Harry and Ginny are meant to be together...
Who else could Harry be with?
Harry's been the marked man from the start and if he did have a girlfriend , he would need someone strong enough to understand and respect his position...
Ginny is exactly that...
She would never tell him to turn his back just to be with her...
She realises the importance of his mission...
And she's always loved him

2007-08-03 00:09:19 · answer #3 · answered by Jaishree 2 · 3 1

Seriously! Ginny is like so annoying..but remember how she had that crush on Harry at the beginning?i think that's why J.k Put it like that
sort of like..if you like someone..don't give up..or something?

lol but then again..i don't think anybody wanted Tonks, Lupin, Fred, Dobby and a lot of other people to die
personally..i think Harry should have died:l

2007-08-03 08:22:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

yes, ginny is annoying. I hate the whole fiery feminist attitude that Lily and Ginny have. It's so irritating. I think everyone hates ginny though, so you're not alone. I dont think the ending really sucked. the important thing is that it was a happy ending, it would have been horrible if it had been a sad ending. I loved the book though, it was BRILLIANT.

2007-08-02 23:52:36 · answer #5 · answered by mary s 2 · 1 1

Well, JK Rowling has her ways on telling a story. What matters is that the story is worth reading. And yes, I do agree that her style of writing has changed.

2007-08-03 00:07:28 · answer #6 · answered by Adis A 2 · 1 0

Well, first I have no clue what "upnoxious" means. I suspect that you mean obnoxious. Plus, you don't actually tell us anything about why you believe that!

Personally, I think Harry and Ginny are great together, and I love that he officially gets to be a member of the Weasley family. After losing so much of his family, it's nice that he's now part of such a huge one.

2007-08-02 23:48:11 · answer #7 · answered by Obi_San 6 · 6 1

Wow, for someone who claims to read you sure have terrible grammar and spelling. I laughed my way through this question. Why would you say "shan't"...are you 200 years old? What's "upnoxious"? You say, "...if your own those ppl..." how do I own people? I thought slavery was over. Good job with your English.

2007-08-03 01:41:25 · answer #8 · answered by NYinFL 4 · 2 0

it was totally awesome!!!!!!!!

i think JK rowling wanted harry to have the same ending as his parents - the death part.
harry who looks exactly like his dad married a redhead and their life was full of love and happiness.

2007-08-03 00:17:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

J. K. Rowling is as J. K. Rowling does. She has a very small box of chocolates.

2007-08-03 04:20:30 · answer #10 · answered by Ralph 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers