English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.physics911.net/faketerror

Ron Paul 2008

2007-08-02 20:31:14 · 15 answers · asked by Honey Girl 3 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

So far yes.

In this case, "traitor" refers to someone who seeks to destroy or damage the Constitutional principles this country was founded on, and who betrays their oath of office to support and defend the Constitution.

But Ron Paul looks to be cut from the same mold..... at least, according to his voting record and platform. Just not criminal.

2007-08-02 20:54:43 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3 0

Young Lady, before you start calling our leaders traitors, you need to look this word up so that you CLEARLY understand what the word implies and what such a statement can mean to you by saying it.

Bush and Cheney are President and Vice President of my country, and being a lot older than you are, and having been around the block several times, I do not consider them to be traitors, perhaps a better word would be lousy leaders, but not traitors, there is a big difference in the meanings.

The quicker that you understand the differences, the better off you will be.

2007-08-02 20:46:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Yupp. And they are the stupidest, and worst humans to occupy the White House.

Wow guys! Three in a row! Thats pretty hard to do!

2007-08-03 10:55:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not so fast, comrade socialist.

Your party hasn't made capitalism a "war crime", yet; but we know you're trying real hard.

I'm sure while the Clintons were amdist dozens of scandals and denying dozens of crimes, you were one of the ones, cheering for Hillary to get away with stealing FBI files, leading the attack on victims of Billy's sexual harrassments, selling pardons to criminals, it goes on and on and on; but you think Bush / Cheney are criminals because they defended the USA, something a liberal would never do, under any circumstances. The only military act liberals support is surrender!

2007-08-02 20:45:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 2 2

Thank you coragryph for answering this question correctly.
To add to that I think Bush beat Nixon by a long shot in earning this title of traitor.


Also, stop bashing liberals it's pointless.

2007-08-02 21:22:48 · answer #5 · answered by danksquish 3 · 0 1

Not since they found the 400lb Russian Frankenstein left over from the cold war, i heard it was found in the basement, the first words were, "my vas zakopaem" after hearing such they threw him back into the basement.... such irony.

2007-08-02 20:52:33 · answer #6 · answered by jerome2all 6 · 0 0

probably, but maybe time will put them in better perspective.

clinton's selling out our rocket science to the chinese could prove bigger in the long run.

Roosevelt steering the usa into WWII was big.

2007-08-02 20:40:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You never answered my question Honey, so here it is again.

If they're so powerful and evil that they masterminded the death of 3000 Americans, carried it out with ruthless and heartless efficiency, then managed to fool nearly 90% of the population.... why are you still typing at your keyboard? Certainly any group powerful enough and ruthless enough to execute something like that could find and silence you and that nut who put out Loose Change in a nano-second, then erase all the evidence from the web. But they don't, because like the rest of us, they understand you're full of it.

2007-08-02 20:34:46 · answer #8 · answered by Dekardkain 3 · 2 4

Somehow I believe you have some of your kool aide tainted. Will you please come down from your fantasy and face the fact that no law was broken

2007-08-02 21:05:42 · answer #9 · answered by meathead 5 · 0 1

If 666 is tattooed on their butts,your darn right!

2007-08-02 20:48:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers