is it better to under-eat or over-eat ?

Question

out of these two choices only -

is it healthier for your body if you over eat no healthy food but all junk food, or is it better for the body to under-eat but when you do eat , its only healthy ?

i've always been curious about this , just thought i'd ask, and before you answer this, i'm not starving myself or overeating so i don't need advice on how to eat lol

Answer 1

It depends on my appetite.

Answer 2

It is definitely not healthy to do either and I am going to go against the norm and say that it is worse on your body to under-eat for the simple fact that your body needs certain vitamins and nutrients to remain healthy and if you continually under-eat you are depriving your body of those things the same as if you ate a bunch of junk food all the time. But, again, I think one is just as bad as the other.

Answer 3

If they are only the two choices then under-eat but healthy. Though neither options are particularly healthy either way. You should eat the amount of food your body requires each day so it's getting the vitamins and minerals it requires to stay healthy.

Answer 4

Jimmy John's, Panda Express, Potbelly's, Chipotle, Quizno's, Culver's, Panera Bread, Portillo's

Answer 5

Under eat, I'd suppose. Over eating is more destructive.

Answer 6

if i have to choose it would be, under-eat and only eat healthy foods.

Answer 7

Well for me, it would be best to under-eat, but not sure about anyone else.~~~

Answer 8

under-eat the better but drink lots of water.

Answer 9

Overeat. You won't die as soon from over-eating than under-eating.

Answer 10

Should eat to live, not live to eat. Moderation is a good thang.

Answer 11

under-weight, underweight
over-eat, overweight
eat moderate, nice and slim