English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean 'Sir' Elton John thinks we should all get rid of the internet and Sharon Crow thinks we should only use one square of toilet paper and Ted Kennedy thinks everyone with an extra bedroom should rent it out to an illegal.
And Hillary Clinton thinks all of the African Americans who are currently locked up in prison should be released and given executive jobs instead.
The Global Warming Fanatics thinks we should revert back to the stone age in order to save our planet and Condi Lisa Rice thinks Israel would have peace if only they'd hand their land over to their enemy's on a silver plater.
I mean if they were left to their own devices and allowed to shape the world into what they believe to be 'perfect' what do you think it would be like?

2007-08-02 15:36:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Royphil 345
Actually I think it's disgusting in the first place to make what a celebrity says newsworthy material and much of what the media is reporting on these days is stupid and not worth mentioning.And your right it is all propaganda meant to confuse us and condition us to being used to thinking with only half a brain.
I mean if they can dish out unintelligent crap and we get used to hearing only that then are we ever going to want anything else?
I realize all of this but I was bored earlier today and wanted to poke fun at them so I got a little carried away.
Thanks for your answer.

2007-08-02 21:02:28 · update #1

13 answers

Hmm. Well, I'm not sure.

I'm thinking a cartoon land full of lollipops and chocolate, total gender ambiguity with lawless hordes of pleasure seekers dancing about burning crosses and various objects of idolatry.

2007-08-02 16:14:06 · answer #1 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 2 2

You're obviously a Luddite if you think Rice is a liberal.

Further, Elton John's pronouncement about the web had nothing to do with politics. At all. Nada. Zip. Zilch.

Why do you think otherwise?

I don't know Sharon Crow, but Sheryl crow threw out the one square idea because of her work with Laurie David... wife of Larry David... former creator and writer of "Seinfeld"... of which one episode was about Elaine needing toilet paper and having to BEG for... ONE square of toilet paper.

In other words, it was a joke.

Get it? Yeah, I thought not - too far over your head.

Hillary Clinton has never proposed releasing prisoners of any color or ethnicity, nor has she proposed getting them executive jobs.

Global warming activists do not want, and have never said, to revert to the Stone Age. (Note that "global warming" is small case, and Stone Age is capitalized.) In fact, global warming activists point out - rightly - that when action is taken to address scientific challenges, the resulting technologies become commercialized and have a multiplier effect to GROW and even transform the economy, and rapidly. Reference the Apollo space program.

Ted Kennedy has never suggested renting rooms out to anyone. But if you have the room in that double-wide trailer of yours, you might want to see what the market will bear.

Condoleeza Rice (oh snap! Had to correct your spelling again) has never proposed the peace solution you attribute to her. In fact, her posture has been very much the opposite, as indicated by her ongoing deliberate LACK of action to resolve violent incidents concerning Israel.

Which leaves just your original question - what would a liberal's idea of a perfect world be? (Note how I had to edit your original question for syntax, punctuation, and proper case.)

The answer: It would be a world in which people like you don't draw false inferences, disseminate whole-cloth lies, or generally babble ignorantly while drooling from their mouths.

2007-08-02 15:58:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 4 1

Wow Adelaide...

Sometimes it seems like you really get it... and other times it seems like you still fall for too much of the propaganda...

All these things you speak of have been in the works for a long time now, under Democrats and mostly Republicans. It's all about the treasonous "globalist" controlled government slowly and steadily looting the USA and taking more control over every single thing, getting the population used to slavery... No one leader has ever taken us so far towards the end of freedom, the middle class, and our very sovereignty as a nation as George Bush. Forget about who's being blamed or paid to spread propaganda... Pay attention to the fact that this stuff is being "advertised", happening and being planned NOW, under THIS administration. Isn't it funny that the press is spreading this supposedly "liberal" garbage, yet the same press is completely disregarding anyone who has REAL problems with this administration and their MANY questionable, illegal, treasonous and unconstitutional acts?

It's all just worthless garbage like you said. But, it's non-stop garbage always designed to repeatedly send the same message of fear and that giving the government more power will be what "saves" us. Sounds much like Bush's terrorism message... Coincidence???

It's all the same message wrapped a million different ways to desensitize us to it. Different slants to effect different people... Don't be confused by where they say these messages are coming from... They're coming from the people running the world RIGHT NOW. The same people who've been running it for awhile and will continue to do so unless we take our country back. We are being bombarded by these messages because they wish it. Any ideas they truly don't want you to hear are ignored by the media. That's becoming pretty darn obvious these days!!!

It's all garbage to distract people from the real issues. To divide and conquer by dividing us into Dems and Repubs... when they're all on the same team... and it ain't ours. We need to be on the same team too. Many Americans are obviously realizing this because ALL THE POLITICIANS, DEMS AND REPUBS ARE AT ALL TIME LOWS IN THE POLLS. I hate to see a good, God-fearing lady like yourself continue to fall for this garbage. You know I love ya'...


You think it's just a coincidence that a drug and gun culture is being pushed by the "globalist" controlled media at the same time there's a "war on drugs"??? That our prison population is THE WORLD'S LARGEST... and by some coincidence if these people were set free there'd be no lower-level jobs left in this country for them? Maybe we should stop drugging, brainwashing and imprisoning some of our people and take their jobs back the from FOREIGN SLAVES AMERICANS WERE OBVIOUSLY NEVER MEANT TO BE IN THE SAME LABOR MARKET WITH!!! WHAT TREASON!!!... (deep breath) So... Yeah... Maybe we should keep some of our poor out of prison... Maybe we should COME TOGETHER and rebuild our families, neighborhoods and society instead of being divided and acting like the anti-social, weak, immoral, self-centered, overly competetive, bootlicking slaves they've turned us into.

2007-08-02 17:19:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Holland located in the Caribbean with Manhattan Island anchored nearby like a cruise ship. Very educated and intelligent people, civilized cities, and a peaceful international culture.

2007-08-02 15:41:08 · answer #4 · answered by topink 6 · 4 1

Well , i just wanted to say there will never be such a thing as a perfect world. So Elton John, Sharon Crow and Condi, can all go on and preach the stuff they want to. Wont do us any good.

2007-08-02 15:40:35 · answer #5 · answered by AngryFalafel 4 · 1 3

"My perfect liberal world"
By: I'm Ok

I think that we should use 3 sheets of toilet paper, give Israel to the Palestinians, African Americans should not be discriminated against, and Elton John should join Yahoo Answers.

2007-08-02 16:21:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I hope you realize only about half of those people are actually liberal...

But -- under a world purely according to liberal philosophy -- everyone would be free to do whatever they want, and the govt would be limited only to stopping the most violent offenders. This includes no govt regulation of handguns, no govt regulation of business, no govt regulation of media, no govt regulation of personal conduct. No govt charity either.

Under a world according to liberal economics -- every business would be free to do whatever it wants -- subject only to what its consumers demand of it and applicable criminal laws. No trade protections, no minimum wage, no limits on who gets hired -- no govt regulation except where the business is causing direct harm to people or the community.

Liberals oppose socialism,. which is govt regulation of business and govt mandated charity. Liberals also oppose govt restrictions on behavior (which conservatives want).

Anyone would be free to practice any religion they want -- but the govt doesn't pay for anything for anyone. No tax breaks for churches. No special treatment for religions, or any minority groups -- everyone gets treated exactly the same.

That's the liberal philosophy -- which is not what Democrats or socialists in the US are trying to do. So, please stop confusing liberals with either of those other groups.

2007-08-02 15:39:42 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 5 1

you seem to be under the impression that extreme liberals speak for all liberals.

it's common sense that this is not true. but then again, it's pretty hard to explain even the simplest of concepts to conservatives when most of them are stupid rednecks.

2007-08-02 15:57:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The Liberals wanted the US to have Black ex-convicts as company executives, gay marriage, legalized abortion and illegals to occupy welfare houses.

2007-08-02 18:22:41 · answer #9 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 1

You are too uniformed for me to answer this in a way you would understand.

Thanks for informing me that Condi is a liberal.

2007-08-02 15:39:23 · answer #10 · answered by tarro 3 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers