Yet they believe that Clinton had a body trail behind him and that there is a "liberal media"...I guess when I was seeing Monica's dress for six months, it was the "conservative media"...you guys are hilarious...btw, I think they are all ridciulous
2007-08-02 14:41:48 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
BECAUSE NEOCONS BELIEVE EVERYTHING BUSH'S HENCHMEN SAY. NO MATTER HOW PLAIN IT IS TO SEE THROUGH THE LIES.
2007-08-02 14:44:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 12⤋
Study out last month that those in the news industry overwhelmingly donate to democrats. Yeah the media bashed Clinton during the Monica thing, but have fawned over him ever since as a way to say "Sorry". And 9/11, anything other than 19 radical Middle Eastern men ramming planes into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon are ridiculous because that's exactly what happened.
2007-08-02 21:59:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Whats REEEALLY stupid is that all the cons on here think that the "liberal media" chose to show us that damned blue dress...
Whenever the President of the United States is on trial, of COURSE the media will be there...
Never mind the irrelevant case cooked up by Kenneth Starr that is really responsible for the blue dress being the focal point of the presidency.
Nevermind that the station that showed it 32 times in one day was none other than.... FOX.
They seem to think that sex sells because the media is liberal.
Sex is just there and would go unnoticed if it weren't for Republi-cons always focusing in on it.
2007-08-02 21:53:06 · answer #3 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Dude there's more evidence of a conspiracy on the attack on Pearl Harbor om 7 Dec 1941, 80% percent of the Pacific fleet happened to be out on a training exercise? and that's pretty far fetched, than there is on 9-11, just another liberal speading there hate propoganda, dude get a life. I guess the terror attcks during the 90's are all a conspricy done by Clinton 2??? and I can't stand Clinton even though he did nothing about these terror attacks, before and after they occerred, I highly doubt he let these Terror attacks happen, Khobar Towers 19 Airman wounded 300 injured, U.S. Embassy Bombing in 98, U.S.S. Cole in 2000, 93 World Trade center bombings???
2007-08-02 21:57:44 · answer #4 · answered by dez604 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The theories are stupid but amusing. I don't believe Clinton had a body trail (unless I suggest 9/11 was his fault). The sex scandal was hot news of an affair since the days of JFK (I really did like his character of a president...he's the reason I was a Democrat). That dress thing got old fast, I know what you mean. Even the 9/11 commission (<--joke in itself) proved beyond all doubts what happened...unless it was Crab People! lol!
Remember, try to use "some" or "most" when referring to a specific classification of people :)
2007-08-02 22:02:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
well the 9/11 "theories can be applied to any incident, even the bridge that collapsed. however there is little to no contradicting evidence that illustrates a very heavy liberal biased in the media. and the clinton body count was very awkard, no other president to my knowlage had anything remotly close hapening to him.
2007-08-02 21:53:21 · answer #6 · answered by Adam of the wired 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
There are a lot of theories out there about 9/11, and you don't say which ones you support, or which ones you think are stupid.
As far as body trails go, what about Vince Foster? He knew too much about the Arkansas years. Also, what about Ron Brown? I'll bet no one here even remembers him, much less what happened to him.
2007-08-02 21:44:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 1⤋
Some are ignorant idiots that just want to believe that they are gonna be safe. So they listen to Bush because he promises this.
Some actually do research more into the subject but don't believe there is enough evidence. These people aren't as bad as the ignorant retards.
2007-08-02 22:02:36 · answer #8 · answered by fortyfootpianist 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Most of this question is trite and idiotic but I've come to expect that around here. As for why I personally think those theories are stupid. Read them. Most of them are poorly written, lack credibility and are presented more like the ravings of a mad man than fact. Add in the near zealots who latch on to the worst of them and yes, I do think buying stock in Reynolds makes sense.
2007-08-02 21:53:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Because the theories ARE stupid!
The mainstream media DOES have a liberal bias. But "sex sells." So the Clinton/Monica scandal got a lot of attention! If you notice, Whitewater itself got little attention.
2007-08-02 21:50:29 · answer #10 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 7⤊ 4⤋
it's simple.. the reason cons say that 911 theories are stupid is because their government is in power.. if they admitted that everything surrounding 911 smelled of fish, then they would be admitting that the government they support are jaded.. and we couldn't have that, could we..
lastly.. what is stupid is that people actually believe the absurd "official story"...
2007-08-02 22:21:32 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋