English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Michael Savage had this to say on his July 30th broadcast

Savage asked, "Am I to believe there's no connection between Charles Schumer on Friday saying he would never appoint, or never, excuse me, approve another Bush appointment to the court, to any court? And then the chief justice suffers a so-called seizure two days later? You're telling me there's no possibility of a conspiracy by the Democrats to have caused this seizure in some manner?" He added: "Tell me it's not possible, and I'll tell you you're a liar."

If that's not freaking paranoid and delusional I don't know what is then

2007-08-02 13:55:06 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Oh look John B and his stupid azz is back again

2007-08-02 13:59:35 · update #1

18 answers

Because statements like that indicate a conspiracy nut.

Some conspiracy theories are at least arguably plausible (even if unlikely) -- that one doesn't come anywhere near the ballpark of plausible.

I don't really care which end of the political spectrum someone like that claims to occupy -- there is a certain level of irrationality that transcends politics and every rational person should reject them.

2007-08-02 13:59:07 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4 1

As a moderate I will try to answer this the best I can. I do not listen to talk radio or watch Fox, nor do I listen to any communist programs like ABC News, CNN and so forth.

So when I come to the conclusion that socialists are conspiracy nuts that information comes from you guys, you make it perfectly clear that you are figgin delusional whackos.

Does that clear it up for you from the perspective of a Moderate.

2007-08-02 22:59:06 · answer #2 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0 0

At least the right-wingers I know don't think that the left is paranoid (although they do have other unvalidated stereotypes like "they're all intellectual snobs.")
I'd say that the two parties are about equally paranoid, although the right tends to be less paranoid about government conspiracies and more paranoid about ways in which the things the dems do will lead to cultural decay.

2007-08-02 21:03:45 · answer #3 · answered by Lynn M 3 · 0 0

You know exactly what freaking paranoid and delusional is. It's a prerequisite of being a Democrat. If you add the word Moron you will have the Democrat motto.

2007-08-02 21:10:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That's exactly why I don't listen to Savage. His crazy conspiracy theories make him sound too much like Cindy Sheehan or Michael Moore.

2007-08-02 21:00:13 · answer #5 · answered by Eukodol 4 · 2 0

That's a new one LOL.

You know when I first read your question, I assumed you were going to talk about how the right-wing CTs whine about Clinton having those people supposedly bumped off.

Ahh, good ol' Michael Weiner (Savage). LOLOLOL.

2007-08-03 01:30:27 · answer #6 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 0 0

Doesn't Michael Savage live in Creedmore?

2007-08-02 21:01:20 · answer #7 · answered by fionabtoo 4 · 1 0

I don't listen to Savage and therefore wouldn't know. :)

Are you saying that there are no left wing conspiracy nuts or are you using this as an excuse to continue being one?

hahahahahahahaha!

2007-08-02 21:10:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Savage saying that in no way compares to "Bush was behind the wheel of 9/11".

2007-08-02 20:59:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Savage is a right wing Howard Stern, just a shock jock to get ratings.

2007-08-02 20:57:51 · answer #10 · answered by leo 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers