What are the names of non-christion scientists who say that evolution could not have happen?

Answer 1

I don't know if anyone understood the point of the question.
I believe you are asking if there are any scientists who are NOT religious (as in agnostic or atheist) who rejects evolution. In other words, of the only 1% to 4% of scientists who reject evolution, are any of them NOT religious?

I'm not sure anyone could name a single such scientist.

It is NOT true that all scientists who believe in evolution are atheists (about 40% of them believe in God in some sense). But it does seem to be true that the few scientists who *reject* evolution, also have deep religious convictions.

Answer 2

You have been misinformed. What you have to understand is that as time passes, the world moves into new times and new things, and the human understanding must constantly be renewed. God makes all things new!

Beginning about 300 years ago, the human ability to reason brought about the Enlightenment, and with it the scientific revolution. For most people, the Enlightenment brought intellectual freedom and an opportunity to draw closer to a rational grasp of the reality in which we are immersed.

THESE PEOPLE ARE THE WINNERS.

There remained and still remain, however, a minority of people who do not understand the meaning, the power, the godliness and the beauty of that rational understanding, but instead find it frightening. These people prefer to remain with their incorrect understanding that in the past there were people who had a correct understanding of things that came from supernatural sources. These people insist that their faulty understanding of the older magical sources is the real understanding, and that those who have accepted the rational way of approaching reality must be wrong because modern people disagree with what the leaders of these regressive thinkers want their followers to believe.

THESE PEOPLE ARE THE LOSERS.

The winners win and the losers lose for the simple reason that REALITY IS WHAT REALITY IS, AND NO ONE'S WISHES TO THE CONTRARY MATTER AT ALL.

Evolution is a well understood process, and NO competent scientist will ever say that it does not happen. The evidence for evolution is overwhelming, and all the winners accept the notion of evolution. Only the losers refuse to accept it.

Here is a web site that is easy to understand that explains in simple terms why the notion of Evolution describes reality correctly.

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/evohome.html

From this you will learn why the Godly, sane approach to reality is to accept the fact that Evolution explains part of the mystery of how God creates his creation, and why being afraid to accept the notion of Evolution is ungodly and based on irrational fears.

Please save your fear for fearing ("revering") God, and see if you can outgrow fearing reality. Leave the LOSERS behind, and become a WINNER. Relax, and let the Holy Spirit carry you into the real world.

Answer 3

No "scientist" will say evolution could not have happened. Most of the christian "scientists" try to show how evolution is gods will and the working of gods law.

It's really difficult to contradict obvious reality and still be called a scientist. It would make as much sense as denying the "theory" of gravity.

Answer 4

It doesn't matter as they are wrong. There are 200,000 published scientific peer-reviewed papers on evolution. There aren't any at all that prove that it couldn't have happened. The scientists who say evolution couldn't have happened have their credibility in question. It might be what they honestly believe, but in science you need more than just belief - you need evidence, and there is plenty of it in favor of evolution and none of it that refutes it... none.

Answer 5

this is kind of shameful, but if you posted in religion & spirituality you'd have a better chance of getting the answer. That's where the creationists hang around, and they are the only ones who seem to have heard of these 'scientists'.

Answer 6

Creationists

Answer 7

I gave you the correct answer below. The list you request would be entirely too long. Some one gave you a link to muslim scientists who are delusionally blind to natural processes. Go there and stop clogging valuable space here with inane questions.

Answer 8

the Q: What are the names of NON-CRISTIAN SCIENTIST who say that evolution could not have happen?

if u want to know the non-cristian scientist, i frankly dont know.
but i would like to suggest u a reading by 'harun yahya' a moslem. he write articles and you can download them from his page:
http://www.harunyahya.com/
if you are a cristian, i am sorry. the content in this page quite religious but with scientific evidence. but f u want to do analysis, his point of view quite acceptable....

Answer 9

When you learn to spell Christian, you might be qualified to discuss the difference between Christian and non-Christian scientists and the difference between the Creation Story as opposed to evolution.
Nevertheless, in all these thousands of years, not one shred of evidence of anything continuing to "evolve", has been found --- alive.
In six thousand years and counting of man's history on this earth, there has been overwhelming evidence to the credibility of the Creation story. Many non-Christian scientists who tried to disprove Creationism became believers as the scientific evidence was mounted. The rest continuted to pervert the truth.

Answer 10

edgar, carl, and jim bob.