put urself in a murder situation would u want ur accomplice to get the wittness protection progam for snitching or go down together? think hard about this one...
~Wizzy Baby~
2007-08-02 12:27:29 · 9 answers · asked by Wizzy_Baby 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
You sound like a wiz the wiz I just took baby.
2007-08-02 12:31:50 · answer #1 · answered by Chalie M 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Being a murderer, I would think that having the snitch go down with me would be the last of my concerns. The snitch would have gotten a plea bargain to get into witness protection, in order to avoid being charged as an accomplice so then the snitching wouldn't be indictable in the first place.
2007-08-02 19:37:28 · answer #2 · answered by SodaLicious 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. i wouldnt be in a murder situation.
What kind of person are you?
2. NOT snitching should be a crime and you should go down as an accomplice and as an obstruction of justice and as an accessory.
2007-08-02 19:36:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why would you murder someone in the first place? The snitch is in the right, he's doing what is right in turning the murderer in. The idea of honor among theives and blood pacts and those kinds of things is utterly ridiculous and barbaric.
2007-08-02 19:37:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but if I were "in a murder situation," I'd be the snitch. I'm not going down for anyone else's stupidity or evil deeds. Seems to me that you're the one not thinking hard enough. If you're dumb enough to kill someone, at least be smart enough to do it alone.
2007-08-02 19:40:24 · answer #5 · answered by Hillary 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You cannot make it a criminal action to tell the truth -- that's non-sensical.
Lying under oath is a crime. If you also make it a crime to tell the truth under oath -- that leaves nothing a witness can say and the entire criminal justice department collapses.
2007-08-02 20:31:57 · answer #6 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
WHY???
In at least 80% of cases - they catch the criminal because someone tips off the police. And what's to stop the other guy from doing the same thing?
2007-08-02 19:40:58 · answer #7 · answered by kr_toronto 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why would protecting communication between criminals and their actions be more important than solving said hypothetical murder?
I it doesn't needs *that* much thinking, c'mon.
2007-08-02 19:36:39 · answer #8 · answered by sbcalif 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
People will do whatever to survive, so thatis why there is no honor among thieves
2007-08-02 19:35:48 · answer #9 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋