Ok, now she is attacking him for saying he WONT use nukes in Paki or Afghani when going after terrorists, and she says, get this, " a President never takes nuclear weapons options off the table" as she attempts to make it sound like shes the end all authority on them.
If he had said he would use them, she would have attacked him for that. Shes just looking for more ways to spout off and sound important, which has always been her specialty.
2007-08-02 12:22:49 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
She is showing that she is afraid of him getting ahead by continuously attacking him; unfortunately fellow Dems. don't seem to all see it that way. I worry about Hillary-I don't know how well she will do in a general election. Obama would probably be able to get more votes from Ind. and Reps.
2007-08-02 14:09:08 · answer #1 · answered by It is what it is 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As long as you get that lunatic Dubya out of the Whitehouse, I don't see a problem ;)
Hillary is attacking Obama because he is her biggest opponent for the Democratic nomination. I think it is sensible of Obama to take a calm, reasoned approach to the Middle East conflict and refuse to use nuclear weapons. We can't all be bloodthirsty warmongers, after all. I hope Obama wins the nomination and the presidency, he will bring peace and security to the USA in my opinion.
2007-08-02 12:38:56 · answer #2 · answered by Coração 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a Republican and do not like either of these people (at all). I have to say that the one playing the fool of these two is not Hillary however. Obama is only making Hillary look good, while getting himself all kinds of bad press.
If Obama can't take the heat he needs to get out of the kitchen. If you think Hillary is bad just wait till the Republicans go at him.
2007-08-02 15:22:52 · answer #3 · answered by Calvin 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think Hillary is right here. Obama is just being stupid if he thinks he can take anything off the table and that helps his position.
Of course, you may have a point in that Hillary would just have said the opposite of Obama. Which of course is why i wont vote for either of them.
2007-08-02 12:50:10 · answer #4 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she indeed is spending too much time bashing everyone and repeating what she read in the newspaper 3 months ago. She should discuss actual critical issues and feisable solutions to win the support of that small percent of liberals that are not extremists. Also, she's a fool regardless.
2007-08-02 14:17:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the biggest one interior the final 2 years on April a million has been the flow of the counsel some "Dooms Day Virus". style of like the Y2k situation each and every physique working around frantically attempting to get a rapid restoration. effective made those disaster and adrenaline junkies happy. what's the Spiritually in an April fools shaggy dog tale?
2016-12-11 08:35:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is using alot of racial undertones to make it appear that obama is clueless..Unfortunaltey I think its working for her..Although in this specific instance I agree that the nuke option should never be taken off the table. Obama needs to stop making statements in absolutes..
2007-08-02 13:16:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you ask me (and even if you don't) I think these two are in a race who can come up with the most ridiculous campaign promise. Regardless who wins, the US looses.
2007-08-02 12:28:36 · answer #8 · answered by hironymus 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As far as I'm concerned she make a fool of her self every time she opens her mouth
2007-08-02 12:41:50 · answer #9 · answered by 1st Buzie 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's just politics, and they were talking about a hypothetical situation that hopefully will never happen. Whatever.
2007-08-02 12:42:48 · answer #10 · answered by majnun99 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋