terrorist scum is dead?

Question

the terrorist that was burnt in the glasgow bombings is dead

at last nhs money can be spent on someone who deserves it, and the nurses and doctors can go back to treating worthwhile cases
bring on all the thumbs down you want....but ihope he was in agony till the end.....anyone agree

toitmoi.......who speaks like this..........um....
I do.....and many more on this question, or can't you read!!?

tank.....no one would glorify in my death for the reason that i would never cowardly kill innocent people including children. he wasn't human, he was scum.
don;t you read the other answers?

merovingian
yes i see your point of keeping him in isolation, but you can understand how angry it makes the NORMAL person.
and all the defenders of these people are either trolls but more likely the same person with multi profiles on here.
thanks for your opinion

Answer 1

I agree, I do not think those who threaten our country and commit such acts of terrorism should be allowed to live. tank, I do not understand how you can condone ones behaviour. This person was a terrorist. plain and simple. Like a loose cannon. these people cannot be trusted. Its frightening to think these people are around us every day and we are unaware. I would have let him burn. To all you human rights activist out there that may seem harsh but his intention was to die so why shouldnt he. Why should the tax payers keep him alive - surely he wouldnt have wanted the people he hated most in the world keeping him alive. I'm sorry, but I say burn the bas****s!!

Answer 2

Since it appears that he intended to be a 'suicide bomber' to start with,he's done what he chose to do in the first place, ie DIED. It's cost the tax-payer many thousands of pounds to keep him alive and have an armed police guard around him 24/7. Anyone with 90% burns was never going to survive anyway and it seems to me that he was only kept alive and that medics worked so hard and spent so much money on keeping him going so that WE would could not be accused of neglecting him. Whatever 'cause' he chose to kill others for - not even an animal kills for the sake of it. I don't believe in capital punishment, but if he had already chosen to die - he should have been allowed to do so, without costing us so much money. People are dying of malnutrition every day in the UK and it (allegedly) cost £3k a DAY just to protect him in hospital, apart from the cost of treatment. He will answer to God - I believe I know which way he will be sent - and it won't be up!

Answer 3

I just happen to have read an article stating that he was most likly a member of Al-Qaeda. Evidence from his residence that was recovered was speeches from Osama Bin-Laden and other paraphenalia linking him to the radical fundamentalist group. I do agree he got what he deserved. He actually tried to drive a jeep loaded with explosives into the Glasgow Airport, yet he was the only one that was injured, at least that was what I got from the article. Another thing, this man did not care enough for himself or the intended innocent victims he tried to murder. That also includes the many children and parents roaming around waiting in line at the ticket area and baggage handling. Why should we have cared about him. Maybe the reason is that I believe he was another lost child of God. A man who lost his way and had murder in his heart. I do agree that we should not celebrate the death of anyone. To me, that puts us at the same level of those individuals that do not care who lives or dies when they use their warped sense of doing God's or Allah's bidding. In the U.S., Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols used their own fanatical reasons for using a car bomb to kill 160+ men, women, and children in Oklahoma City. Both were caught, convicted, and sent to prison for life or put on death row (McVeigh was finally executed five years after his sentence). Hate can and does consume the morals of any good hearted person. Remember what Christ said in the "Sermon on the Mount."

Answer 4

Sorry but I wanted him to remain in agony for many years, not on the back of the NHS, but to really suffer a long time for what he tried to do.

I don't think Questioners can get thumbs down now.

Answer 5

As much as I agree with you, your all missing the point.

HE set out to die, and now the c@nts a martyr. Dont you think this is going to inspire MORE home grown fundamentalists...?

He should have been kept in a dungeon ( had he survived ) with no human contact.

Answer 6

The only reason I would hope for an injured terrorist to remain alive is to interrogate him and discover his associates.

After wards, good riddance.

Answer 7

Save your real hatred and vengeance for the perverted and warped ideology that brain-washed and led him to this atrocious act in the first place. I feel sad that muslim people are duped, coerced and brainwashed into signing up for suicide bombings. They are responsible and accountable for their actions, yes, but they are like the addicts as victims of drug-pushers. If our world view is to prevail over the dismal and malign tyranny of Islamism, it is by showing our qualities of justice and fairness, not by being more ruthless and cruel than they. Otherwise, have they not achieved their evil objectives?

Answer 8

Well sure, except they never got a chance to extract info from him. That may have been handy I think.

Answer 9

GOOD, the garden of Allah?, I don`t think so, the world is a better place without him and it would be even better if all the rest of the terrorists went with him.

Answer 10

Yes, God forgive me, but I hate Terrorist. I believe even God will understand.