I mean, it sure has worked out nicely for the left - everyone's talking about how little effort the Bush administration has put into maintaining infrastructure, and how the money spent in Iraq might have been put to better use right here at home. Does this suggest a liberal conspiracy?
2007-08-02 12:20:35 · 22 answers · asked by Who Else? 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Haliburton.
2007-08-02 19:52:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they do no longer seem to be. you're in basic terms asking a query to make a pretend fact which you need human beings to have faith. you have supply a hyperlink to offer your fake question a pretend air of authenticity: there is not any longer something in the hyperlink that shows that liberals are blaming Bush for the bridge give way. in factor of actuality: street money have been decrease to pay for the conflict in Iraq, yet there is not any indication specific money have been decrease for this bridge.
2016-10-09 02:19:26 · answer #2 · answered by antonovich 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. We haven't been maintaining infrastructure since the 50's when most of this stuff was built. Both democrats and republicans have passed through the white house without taking action.
2007-08-02 12:24:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Good point, but I think it'll be lost on the liberals here. In their minds, Bush collapsed that bridge by failing to pour piles of money on it.
2007-08-02 15:19:27 · answer #4 · answered by Eukodol 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton gave many $ millions to Louisiana to build better protection against floods in New Orleans.
The Democrats in charge of New Orleans and Louisiana diverted the funds to spend on their "arts" and other projects.
Those Democrats NEVER care about infrastructure. Only about lining the pockets of their buddies.
Much the same can be said of ALL politicians.
When was the last time you saw any evidence of a politician behaving like a "Public Servant"?
2007-08-02 12:30:27 · answer #5 · answered by Philip H 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
And pray tell, just how was this accomplished ?
At this point its a mystery why this bridge failed. Instead of having some respect for the victims of this tradgedy, you want to score partisan points? Hopfully most of Bush's supporters have greater decency. Answer is no.
2007-08-02 12:46:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
In a weird, twisted lib type of thought process,would'nt be surprised if they 'hypothetically' tried to steer that unfortunate disaster toward Bush.I mean why not? sure,lets dig to the bottom of the 'false accusation' barrel. It was just a few days ago my kitchen sink backed up w/water...I immeadiatly thought to myself...D*** Bush administration!.
2007-08-02 12:33:32 · answer #7 · answered by effminorseven 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The collapse of the bridge can be blamed to both the Liberals and Democrats for failure to maintain its stability while they were in power.
2007-08-02 12:25:30 · answer #8 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Doubtful.
2007-08-02 12:23:18 · answer #9 · answered by tandkalexander 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nonsense...but accusing Bush is nonsense too. If anything, bridges are better inspected since 9-11
2007-08-02 12:23:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋