When I bring up Clinton, a common answer I get is that its old news. But libs bring up Reagan all the time. Which way do you want it? Oh I forgot libs like it both ways. Hypocrites.
2007-08-02 11:41:23 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I reckon 1988 was his last year. Then it was George HW Bush, then Clinton.
And yes, Libs are just bi-polar.
2007-08-02 11:45:16 · answer #1 · answered by krollohare2 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ronald Wilson Reagan (February 6, 1911 - June 5, 2004) was the 40th President of the United States (1981–1989)
2007 - 1989 = 18.
2007-08-02 18:46:54 · answer #2 · answered by D M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is because you only bring up Clinton instead of defending Bush. Which tells me you know Bush is wrong but try to justify his screw ups with someone Else's. As far as the first part of your question, not long enough. The memory of that stupid SOB still burns my @ss.
2007-08-02 18:53:59 · answer #3 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's all old news to me. We have plenty to deal with in the present.
2007-08-02 18:49:14 · answer #4 · answered by gone 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋