Seriously, hasn't this been hashed enough? And you people still believe everything you read. If you actually read his speech, Obama doesn't want to attack Pakistan. He said after exhausting all diplomatic work, if there was credible intelligence that bin Laden was in Pakistan, then we would need to go in and take him out.
Do you remember 9/11? Remember how horrible it was, the loss of life, the fear, the despair? I do. And bin Laden claimed responsibility and I think just about every American wants that SOB killed or imprisoned for the rest of his miserable life. No? You disagree?
So why do you have a problem with someone wanting to finish what was started and mismanaged and redirected? First you say Dems are too soft on terrorism and are defeatist, then when a Dem actually says we can end this war and we need to take bin Laden out, you call him crazy?
FYI, Clinton has said she'd do the same thing, as well as the Iraq Study Group and countless Republicans. Just because Obama said it, it's suddenly a "bad thing." Give me a break. Only pacifists should be disagreeing with his statement.
And by the way, I will be voting for him.
2007-08-02 11:26:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by genmalia 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I do not think he wants to attack Pakistan. I would not vote him.
2007-08-02 19:04:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Nina, BaC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Mohammed Obama is a loose cannon.
One day he wants to surrender to all our enemies and the terrorists.
And the next day, he want's to start WWIII.
He is a Muslim Nut. (But a Dangerous Communist.)"
Wolf, can you supply anything whatsoever to support that steaming pile of preposterous assertions?
oh, and there's no apostrophe in the verb "wants"
2007-08-02 18:35:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by answer faerie, V.T., A. M. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because politically speaking, Obama is a virgin. He is a fresh face that has not been in politics long enough to become a **ore!
2007-08-02 19:39:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by sbyldy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
As much as I hate the guy, I don't think that he wants to attack Pakistan. Where'd you here that?
2007-08-02 18:12:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by T-22<> 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
because he's going to kick *** and take names! while not the ***- kicker that GEPHARDT (allah bless him) would've been, obama should do some ***- kicking here between now and january 2017. if obama names GEPHARDT (allah bless him) as his vice, then there's no stopping him. it would be like entering bruce lee and jackie chan in a karate tournament, it just wouldn't be fair!
2007-08-02 18:21:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I really think he is short of background to win many votes. Personally I would vote for Rosie O'Donell first and let her drape our military in rainbow colored cammies.
2007-08-02 18:18:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by arborsurgeon 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Why aren't Biden or Richardson leading. They have the most experiance.
Barak & Hillary have the least yet they lead the polls.
2007-08-02 18:14:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by PNAC ~ Penelope 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Mohammed Obama is a loose cannon.
One day he wants to surrender to all our enemies and the terrorists.
And the next day, he want's to start WWIII.
He is a Muslim Nut. (But a Dangerous Communist.)
2007-08-02 18:19:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by wolf 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
He never said anything about Pakistan that I have heard, only Pokistan, wherever that is.
2007-08-02 18:17:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Captain 3
·
0⤊
3⤋