Do you think he would have been blamed personally? Unlike how Clinton was treated.
2007-08-02 10:19:49 · 6 answers · asked by egg_sammash 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ms Sammash,
Well, the ways things are going now (I wouldn't be surprised if someone sued him for medical malpractice!) he would catch a boatload of stuff if that happened on his watch. Yesterday I saw a question that went something like: Is the Minnesota bridge collapse a sign that Bush is neglecting the country's infrastructure?!?!! Now, I am not a Bush lover by any means but a lot of this trash I read is absurd. Excellent question!
2007-08-02 10:25:44 · answer #1 · answered by Pete W 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Ruby Ridge couldn't have happened under the Bush Adminstration.
"IF" it had , Nazis in the FBI & ATF would now be in prison.
Clinton & Janet Reno supported the Nazis at Ruby Ridge & Waco.
What a Shame!!!! What Evil!!!!!!
2007-08-02 17:24:43 · answer #2 · answered by wolf 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The nuts at Ruby Ridge deserved what they got..this is a nation of laws not right wing survivor nuts
2007-08-02 17:22:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ruby Ridge happened under the Bush I regime, but the ultra-right wing loons are too uneducated to know that.
2007-08-02 17:22:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
oh yes, he would have been raked over the coals....
i NEVER liked bush, and yet, with these UNwarranted VICIOUS attacks on him, i am starting to think he may just be alright....
2007-08-02 17:23:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no, he would've gone to war against that
2007-08-02 17:22:03 · answer #6 · answered by andrespb22 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋