Question: Who would you sooner have replaced - Brown, Bush or Putin?
"Dull Jon"s Answer: Bush, but only because I haven't paid enough attention to Brown or Putin to comment on them.
Isn't that just like saying, "I'm really to stupid to learn anything, so I'll just hate Bush like they told me too."?
Screen name says it all I guess...
People are so overwhelmingly stupid. Anyone who didn't say Putin can't be taken seriously about anything. Hatred so blind is a mental disorder.
Should they be subjected to forced sterilization?
2007-08-02 09:56:52 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well "Stig" it's just really stupid to answer a question as if you know something when you don't. Typical of democrats. No need to bother learning all the relevant facts before coming to conclusions.
2007-08-02 10:06:00 · update #1
Good "tomjohn" - snap to the defense of ignorance no matter. Good little robot.
2007-08-02 10:09:11 · update #2
Annnnnnnnnnd, finally there's "dull" himself: So you think because you live here YOU really know what's going on here? Now THAT's stupid.
2007-08-02 10:12:19 · update #3
if you are slamming dull jon, you'll need to do better than that insipid illogical rant of yours.
when you say that people are so overwhelmingly stupid, i assume that you are including yourself.
i hate to break your heart, but to answer your question, that is not the perfect illustration.
you are really sad, aren't you. and just a little stupid. don't go away mad, just go away.....
and to the rest of you cons slamming liberals for nothing, i think that you are the overwhelmingly stupid ones that this guy is ranting about.
2007-08-02 10:05:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You've come to the conclusion that, simply because he hasn't paid attention to the others, his dislike for Bush has no rational basis. This is a very poor argument, as there is no way for you to support it. While it is disturbing that he doesn't know about Putin, that is not to say that he doesn't know enough about Bush to disapprove of his leadership.
Interesting to note that nowhere in your screed was there anything that would lead one to believe that what you were upset about was that he answered a question he should have avoided due to lack of information (Something conservatives NEVER do).
2007-08-02 17:01:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
And so I guess you trolls have been living in the UK and Russia and you know exactly what Putin and Brown have been doing? You couldn't possibly know the truth so I think it is you who are stupid for offering an opinion when you don't know anything about it.
Yes, I see what George does every time I go outside and the cameras everywhere gleam in the sunlight. You bet I'd be ready to replace GW over the 2 that haven't done me any harm.
2007-08-02 17:06:05 · answer #3 · answered by Dull Jon 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush, because he has done more harm in the world than Putin ... but not until Cheney is impeached and convicted.
2007-08-02 17:02:20 · answer #4 · answered by RE 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, in a sense you are right. You shouldn't answer a question if you aren't knowledgeable about the contents.
And forced sterilization, no. Hitler did that too, remember?
2007-08-02 17:00:46 · answer #5 · answered by Serpico7 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To some people ignorance is bliss. You wanna bet this guy is a liberal!. they would love to see USA fail in Iraq so that they can get into power
2007-08-02 17:01:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
you make too many assumptions to be taken seriously.
2007-08-02 17:00:36 · answer #7 · answered by pip 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋