English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

Read up on all of the candidates' stances on the issues and decide for yourself.

2007-08-02 08:30:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

With the reputation the United States has right now, we are looked upon with disgust and hatred.
It is time to put new ideas into practice, and bring unity, peace, and goodwill reputations back home.
Your vote, for whoever you choose, will lead the future.
If you do not vote, then you have the right to not agree with others, but you have no place to complain about it's implementation.
If you find no person worth your vote, then you are freed from the responsibility of what happens from the person elected.

2007-08-02 16:02:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

With all due respect U are free to think and vote for who ever U want. I was in the same page as u are, didnt know who to vote for. But there are a couple of candidates that have been really been looking for a major change, and its not only about IRAQ". I see for example Obama as the strongest person. why him? He came from a lower class family, he knew and understands the life of someone who didnt have anything and learned how to be someone and move on to be a great senator. In order to understand someone U have to be in their shoes to know what people are going through. Now he wants to bring troops back due to making our economy better and stronger by stop spending millions on wars. instead tavx breaks,better livings. Clinton after being humiliated by her husbands mistake, we have to think that he left the economy in great shape. She seems like a strong figure, but for sec. of state she I think is perfect. John Edwards Is a nice guy, people think he's fit due to making a great JFK figure, but being realistic is very smart and can be a president or VP.

2007-08-02 16:11:36 · answer #3 · answered by danny R 1 · 0 0

You should vote for the candidate that best represents/promises what change you would like to see in this country. And you can't necessarily depend on political party; sometimes a candidate from the opposite party that you identify with can be someone you wish to see in office. Research each candidate's stances on certain issues, and remember the power of the Electoral College.

2007-08-02 15:37:13 · answer #4 · answered by Angie 5 · 1 0

Here's a reason to vote Ron Paul in the primaries:
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year (Seriously, who else would even think of doing this?)
Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.

2007-08-05 05:19:44 · answer #5 · answered by Bloatedtoad 6 · 0 0

The person who has done the most for his or her state or city. Go on past performance not on what they say they will do. If you want the highest gas prices in the nation go with Obama. If you think a million dollars great value for a 1000 ft apartment go with Hillary. Or you might letting your man hit on the female employees is great family values, again you got Hillary.

2007-08-02 15:40:25 · answer #6 · answered by Billy M 4 · 0 1

For myself and my family where we lost mom without health care, my dad a surviving World War II Veteran and me suffering a chronic illness without health care, Universal health care, Veterans benefits and uplifting the poor/middle class. All of these aspects clearly can be answered by one best candidate, "HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON".

2007-08-02 16:03:20 · answer #7 · answered by yp_carl_san_francisco 1 · 0 1

Fred Thompson (provided he runs). He will continue President Bush's policies and will bring back the golden years of 2000-2006.

2007-08-02 15:33:23 · answer #8 · answered by mustagme 7 · 0 2

I think you should vote for Tom Tancredo.

He's pro-life, pro-gun, and pro small government. And he's not as liberal as Bush.

2007-08-02 17:00:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ron Paul... he supports the constitution.... how can you not like somebody who believes that the constitution is the law that should be enforced?

2007-08-02 15:36:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers