for me its been bullcrap what was the point of it anyway , as it stands ,**** david , cara (yawn ) shanessa and tracey are in the hwh ,if the public have any sense they will keep trace in , and hopefully shanessa , so lets hope the other two go , to me bb is dragging this hwh crap out for far too long ,its been a complete shambles from start to finish this year i don't know weather i'm coming or going a bit like ziggy lol!!
2007-08-02 07:57:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥BEX♥ 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
You need to identify what is important to you. GCSEs will be a key to other things and some subjects at least will be well nigh impossible if you change to homeschooling now. Year 11 is a tough year for coursework etc and if you effectively missed year 10 then I think it could be very stressful as you'll be doing 2 years work in only one. My own opinion is that you should talk to the school and see if there is any way you can start year 10 so that you do at least have a chance to have something close to the 2 years of study required for GCSE's. When you say you attended public schools all your life, I assume, because you mention GCSEs, that you mean public school in the English sense rather than the US sense. In Public schools you pay for all GCSE entries on top of your fees anyway. Dropping down a year would be less disruptive in the long run than failing GCSe's or not performing as well as you would have done. It would also be less stressful. The only other alternative as far as I can see is to be selective and reduce the number of GCSE's you are attempting - or else perhaps try one of the crammers at Easter? If you did reduce the number of GCSEs then you could always have a year before starting A levels (if that is the route you want to take) in which to take a few more. Those extra GCSE's could perhaps be done on a home school basis if an extra year of school fees would be a financial burden. If you hoped to do A levels you could also try to make a start on one of those on a home school basis so that when you started A levels in earnest you would be ahead of the others rather than always on catch up - as you must feel at the moment. Good luck with your decision..
2016-04-01 11:14:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wondered how BB would get Liam and Ziggy back.... I just knew they would, HOW, was the question.
I certainly wouldn't have voted Ziggy off the show, he's a man who did his best. OK he played someone, ...come on... he's a guy. Guys sometimes do that. I'm happy he's back and pleased to see him enjoy BB at last. He won't win though.
2007-08-02 08:41:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Curious39 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
he went to HWH because he thought that if he stayed in the house he would be nominated and out so being over there served a few things:
1: Gave him hero status with HM as none of them wanted to go in there. They will not put him up now for a while.
2:Creep to the HWH so he had their support and vote before anyone else got their hands on them.
3: He knew some more would come over and the new ones except Jonty are rubbish and not going to be liked as people rare take to new ones this late in game. So BB would get him back somehow.
As for voting I never vote for anything due to all the scams it is most likey fixed to who they want as a winner anyway.
PS Podge i thought that too actors!!David told gerry he knew everything about the house and it was NOT from watching it!!
2007-08-02 06:01:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by momof3 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
i'm really annoyed with how manipulated this whole series of bb has been. first
1) charley and billi's votes weren't counted the week billi went which meant charley would have been nominated; their votes were discounted just to keep charley in and keep viewing figures
2) the fake eviction week was another excuse to give charley an extra week in the house
3) all this business with the halfway house destroys any form of democracy on behalf of housemates AND the public - ziggy would have been hot favourite to be evicted this week and because of this HWH nonsense (which i can't even keep up with btw) he isn't even nominated!!!!
i'm so angry at the producers, they need sorting out!!!
2007-08-02 06:33:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I agree they keep changing the rules just to get the people they want back into the main house. The halfway house is now full of freaks and retards. They want to keep Liam and Amy together because they might do the bizz. And no I won't vote for any of 'em, I'll leave that up to losers.
2007-08-02 07:49:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by georgeygirl 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not only to get Ziggy out but Liam also
2007-08-02 06:53:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He would definately have had my vote if he was still in there, I think he's a creep (if you didn't get the hint from previous answers) !!
However, I do feel a kind of loyalty towards the old bunch, but that is probably because the new guys aren't as good as I was expecting and I'm glad they're all up. I just feel sorry for Tracey, but hey, she'll deal with it !
2007-08-02 06:07:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by kirst is back!! 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
I agree with most of the above answers.
This is clearly an additional role of the dice designed to protect the long term viability of the series. I just don't think they wanted to lose a third big character in a week.
2007-08-02 06:40:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by 'Dr Greene' 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't think anyone can be nominated while they are in the halfway house.
I reckon the five new people are acting parts who will most likely be changed from time to time to try to improve the shows ratings.
2007-08-02 05:57:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋