I think the next President should be a moderate of some kind.
Someone willing to blow up this damn " follow the party " rhetoric and work together to get things accomplished.
2007-08-02 05:00:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Democrat if i'm fortunate, till you savour paying $3.00 for a gallon for gasoline! maximum persons i be responsive to hate invoice Clinton yet i'm going to declare this, he cheated on his spouse, oh properly if she forgave him then who're we to even care! All i be responsive to is that employment grew to become into up, unemployment grew to become into down, if some thing occurred to a member of my kin by using an twist of destiny or ailment i ought to soak up to twelve weeks off artwork and nevertheless have a job as quickly as I got here returned (because of the fact Clinton signed the kin leave act) and that i did no longer ought to problem on the subject of the greater youthful adult men in my kin getting killed in Iraq "babysitting" the oil rigs because of the fact in all certainty that's what they are doing. no longer because of the fact u.s. grew to become into finding for redemption against the terrorist acts of 9/11! i'm no longer a Kerry fan i'm although embarrassed to declare I voted for Bush the 1st time. so some distance as Cindy L's answer...i'm going to debate along with her ANY DAY...I also have a Bachelors degree, and how DARE YOU call everybody stupid! The leaders you so faithfully believe in are the right ones that have replaced my ideas.
2016-11-11 00:40:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think people have FINALLY stated to wake up to what the Republicans really stand for, and it is NOT the same principles that Lincoln, TR, or Eisenhower stood for.
Hell, the chimp almost makes Reagan look intelligent.
I'd like to try to save this nation while there still may be time.
We have to stop being members of political factions and start being AMERICANS again.
2007-08-02 04:58:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by tiny Valkyrie 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think we should elect an American, this Dem, Rep are both from the same side of a coin, it's theater, we should be electing someone basesd on their ideology and principles and weather they abide by the constitution, and the only one running for president that has integrity and his voting record proves that he works for the people is Ron Paul, look him up, see what he stands for, and you will realize that he's a true American, and that's what America needs.
ronpaul2008.com
2007-08-02 04:51:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by mom4peace 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
They had their chance, they had control of the white house and congress and they F*cked everything up. So no the next president should definitly be a Democrat or independent.
2007-08-02 05:00:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by the_end_of_the_cons 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
The only reason for the next President to be a Republican is if Bush gets impeached and removed -- which is why we should impeach and remove Cheney first.
Sorry, Hillary, I'd vote for you otherwise, but Nancy Pelosi gets to be the first female President.
2007-08-02 04:46:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
There will always be people who disagree.. and as such there will always be people who vote for things that don't seem practical to you. I guess what I'm saying is that there will always be some incarnation of the Democrat and Republican parties.. and people who vote for them. Lets just not destroy the nation with our squabbles.
2007-08-02 04:48:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by pip 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Clinton is the only one who has the capability to fix this mess.
2007-08-04 23:02:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ralph 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I do.
I find it interesting that many people think Clinton will be the next president and yet very few people plan to vote for her.
I predict (and hope!) her candidacy will implode.
2007-08-02 04:52:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
One of these days, someone will have the cahones to start a truly viable third party.
2007-08-02 04:48:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋