NO, I don't believe it was but I bet there are the conspiracy loons starting their fake conspiracy sites as I type this!
2007-08-02 03:02:38 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Oh yes, the politics section already has several post saying it was the one parties fault and this and that. Sighh I guess it shows that we do have a mental health problem in the US.
2007-08-02 03:36:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, it wasn't a government conspiracy to kill people.
However, I don't think this is an isolated incident.
The 83 year old steam pipe in NYC that burst last week.
The 45 year old bridge that collapsed.
There's a common theme between the two: Aging infrastructure that's too expensive to replace.
2007-08-02 03:37:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is there any connection between the bridge collapse and the Earthquake that Russia experienced at the same time?
2007-08-02 04:09:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't believe it was, Conspiracy idiots always seem to come out of the woodwork don't they? just like the ones who think that 911 was a conspiracy even as to go so far as to fabricate evidences to support that just because they hate Bush, incredible! and what is worse, they brainwash themselves to believe their own lies, again, becuase of their hatred for bush, absolutely insane.
2007-08-02 05:00:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Go to CNN's web site. There is actual footage of the bridge collapse. It's pretty obvious something broke.
2007-08-02 03:24:30 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HEck yEaH it is... Pelosi couldn't get a bridge bill passed, veto'ed by Bush.Now she is gonna make us pay!!! It was a left wing conspiracy to eliminate right wing baseball fans and working people!
2007-08-02 06:32:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was simply a lack of attention that led to it. So yeah I guess you could say it's the governments fault if the city was in charge of maintenance but....I don't think it was brought down by explosives like WTC building 7 was. ; )
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3664073116607499063&q=WTC+7&total=2751&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=8
2007-08-02 03:23:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
you will see that the vertical columns are nonetheless in tact. no longer “their “ form. The good explanation of the give way of creating 7 doesn’t carry water. till now you purchase into it hook line and sinker you had superb study why it doesn’t carry water. seek word, “WTC development 7” there is something very incorrect with development 7 and shutting your suggestions to it serves no advantageous purpose what so ever.
2016-10-09 01:25:33 · answer #8 · answered by yarnall 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOONS...that's the operative word. It was most likely metal-fatigue.
2007-08-04 12:05:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is government conspiracy , other wise that bridge would 'v been replaced few years ago.
2007-08-02 16:55:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋