I just heard on the news that over thirty percent of the bridges in the US are in dier need of repairs to insure safty. They also said that the government just doesn't have enough money for the funding. Now that is a useless loss of innocent life!
2007-08-02 02:01:53 · 10 answers · asked by reggieg 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
i completely support the trrops that are over there but i don't think that it is their job to be the referees in a civil war. I am sorry is this question seemed insensitive to all of the soldiers. It was nothing against you. You are doing a great job.
2007-08-02 02:19:27 · update #1
The money could be spent in many different ways other than destruction!!! bridges, schools, medicine supplies, jobs, ect.
2007-08-02 04:24:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
on the one hand i would say yes...... i believe we have no business over there ..... and I believe they have no business over here ..... however i am concerned whether it is actually muslim terrorists that caused that bridge to fall in Minneapolis due to the high concentration o Muslims in Minneapolis coming in from Ontario and the writing in all of the bathroom stalls in the truckstops and cheese shops of war against america by muslims ..... if that is the case i would say bring home all of our troops and send over ICBM's and well I know I would get a violation notice if i voice the rest of this but well we will probably never know.... but i dont understand if the shiites did the Towers and we protected the shiites in Bosnia taking out our Bosnian allies and the Sunis were fighting the Shiites in Iraq that would also seem to be our alli in this war ....... why would we be attacking those trying to stop the terrorists ?????
2007-08-02 04:03:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the hardship with liberals is merely that they comprehend plenty that's no longer so. The Liberal ideology is a thought , fostered by skill of a delusional, illogical minority and which holds forth ideals that have not have been given any foundation truly. they're Advocates of a coverage that empowers a solid federal government to enslave its those with a extreme tax burden incident to the help of extravagant and pointless social courses damaging to the two the artwork ethic between the decrease type, and the motivation to innovate and succeed between the working type. "whilst the persons discover that they are able to vote themselves money, which will carry in the top of the republic." Liberals desire to spend different peoples money!! the subjects we are dealing with immediately are by way of fact the persons who artwork for a living are outnumbered by skill of people who vote for a living. @
2016-10-13 11:37:56 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. Our men and women in uniform are over there, so the terrorists won't cut our heads off over here.
It's a shame about the bridges, but that's a state by state issue. Stop using so much salt on the bridges up north. It corrodes the metal structure.
2007-08-02 02:06:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Money used to fund a war comes from federal budgets.
Money used to repair bridges and roads come from state budgets.
So to anwer your question...no. It simply can't be used to repair bridges.
2007-08-02 02:04:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
support the bridges!
bring home the troops
2007-08-02 02:05:36 · answer #6 · answered by shazam 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
that's a very good question...most defiantly.we need too start thinkin about Americans.so write too your president bush...we need to get him out of there..pray for the family's who lost there loved one in the falling bridge yesterday..
2007-08-02 02:12:17 · answer #7 · answered by Sandy M 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
money spent on war would be better spent funding ANYTHING
2007-08-02 02:04:39 · answer #8 · answered by tblightng 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you
2007-08-02 02:04:41 · answer #9 · answered by bowsgirl1 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No.
2007-08-02 02:04:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋