Who would be the best Democrat candidate to solve the problems in Iraq? The same question for Republicans?

Answer 1

First, Define the problem you wish to solve?

If americans were not in iraq, they would not have the need to defend their homland against the intruders....

It is not about cutting and running... It is about doing what is right for the country. for OUR COUNTRY. More and more americans are realizing how they were played by the media and politicians. More and more americans do not support our governments actions of killing over half a million iraq citizens & civilians...

What is the problem you wish to solve? You want iraq war won, america implementing a puppet government to rule the country on our behalf maintaining control of the oil...

That is what our leaders want, when they make it clear they do not wish to cut and run.

They disregard the soverignty of other nations, we bully our way around the world, setting up their governments with people loyal to us.

Leaving Iraq is the ONLY way to solve the problem. The way I see it, the only problem is that we are there... killing thousands of innocent men women and children. Killing men who want to defend their homes, and protect their way of life.

Would we not do the same, if foreigners invaded us?

Ron Paul, is the only one who will stop the corruption in the government and restore our constitutional rights.

Edwards, Clinton, and Rudy are all NWO supporters, with financial ties to Illuminiti, Council of Foreign Relations (main supporters of the NWO & North American Union)

Answer 2

Unfortunately the Democrats couldn't solve problems on "Who's Smarter Than a Fifth Grader" And I am not too pleased with what I see on the Republican side, both Guiliani and McCain are too liberal, perhaps there's hope in Fred Thompson, if he chooses to go in.

Answer 3

Dems love to identify problems, then have lots of meetings and then tell the people how hard they are working on the problem.But like you say, they never actually fix anything.But they do like to take credit for "caring and being compassionate"while people are still suffering. For that matter....has a government program ever solved a problem or just prolonged it?

Answer 4

If it is confined to solving the Iraq mess, probably Joe Biden has the most rational plan.

If the question is with respect to the Presidency overall, right now Hillary has the cards. I don't think she can be elected however, due to gender bias.

Answer 5

None of the candidates are capable of winning this war. Lets pray that President Bush steps up the fight for a speedy victory or that his successor consults him regarding the War on Terror.

Answer 6

None of them - Republican or Democrat.

Only the Iraqi people can solve the problems in Iraq.

Answer 7

None of the candidates running on either side posses the ability to handle any problem .
Politicians by nature can not make a decision that does not place hundreds of millions of dollars in profit to the people that elected them and by that I mean the corporations and lobbies that donated to their campaigns .

Answer 8

Obama, he's intelligent, experienced in government and would start with a clean slate. The fact that his father's father was a Muslim would open doors to negotiating with the Arabs, and the fact that he's a lifelong Christian means he'd represent the views of most Americans.

Answer 9

Lieberman vs. Rudy or Thompson. Joe's the only adult among the democrats.

Answer 10

None of the Democrat candidates are suitable. They are all cut and run left wing liberal loonies.
Rudy Giuliani is the most likely to continue the fight until Iraq is stabilized and running on it's own.