Did you know the (Democrat) mayor of Tulsa OK has been accused of voting twice in different states? Funny how the media is ignoring a Democrat accused of a serious voting felony, while pounding on Coulter for doing something relatively minor.
http://tinyurl.com/2dbnqr
http://tinyurl.com/o35ks
.
2007-08-01 17:33:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Desperate media. They have been commanded to crucify that brat and this is the best they come up with? If she voted twice that may be a problem. Otherwise wrong district, who cares? What is scary is the media probably should not have access to the info. Do they know who she voted for?
2007-08-02 02:04:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh come on now, the mayor of Tulsa just made a little mistake (on a couple of occasions). Likely the mayor just got caught up in the excitement of election day...and anyone could make that mistake.
The mayor shouldn't be held to the same standards as Ann Coulter. The mayor is a good Democrat and Ann Coulter is...well...she's Ann Coulter.
2007-08-01 18:01:47 · answer #2 · answered by GIVRO 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Coulter attracts media attention -- so she gets pounded on because she throws herself in the spotlight.
And as for the Mayor of Tulsa -- an accusation is meaningless without evidence.
2007-08-01 17:42:33 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's time to offer up fussing over A. Coulter. She belongs on an E! information blurb, and that it. Six months from now she would have the capacity to be on HSN hawking classic political memorabilia for the time of the two:00 - 4:00 AM time slot.
2016-11-10 23:49:25 · answer #4 · answered by piazza 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm 100% sure the Ann Coulter issues has been resolved.
2007-08-01 18:13:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Voting twice should be a serious felony. Why do you think the Attorney General is being persecuted by Dems. They don't wont him to interfere with their schemes by firing judges that don't investigate illegal voting.
Voting in the wrong precinct is zilch. No harm, no foul.
2007-08-01 17:40:00 · answer #6 · answered by bravozulu 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Coulter didn't vote in the wrong precinct
2007-08-01 17:37:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Um . . . have you ever noticed that nearly all voting irregularities are found to benefit Democrats? Dead people always vote for Democrats. Homeless people are bribed into voting for Democrats with cigarettes. Downs syndrome patients are dragged into polling centers and taught how to vote for the Democratic candidate. My College had a bunch of students who were going from precinct to precinct, voting for Kerry as many times as they could (they were finally arrested.)
Have you ever wondered why that is? It's because the Left doesn't give a rat's @ss about the will of the people, all they care about is power.
To answer your question, I need to ask one: how many times did she vote?
2007-08-01 17:43:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Coulter brings it on herself to sell books. She's in need of attention (and I'm one of those that gives it too her).
2007-08-01 17:36:53 · answer #9 · answered by netjr 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I was going to say: "turn her into a horse faced hag", but it's too late for that...
2007-08-01 17:37:29 · answer #10 · answered by Nick F 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋