--MCcain will not recover, yes. Illegal immigration issues killed him.
--Rudy is too liberal for the party, but who knows!?
--Mitt did change some positions, but he might be acceptable for nomination...winnings a different thing.
--Fred...no money? He made as much money as Rudy did durning his testing water phase, so you're incorrect and he's higher in the polls (without physical entrance). You say he's a flipper, but most of those 'sources' are convoluted. He nearly matches up in reputable polls to Hillary...I would say he definitely has a chance. You must also remeber Bush wasn't the chose by the base...he was a compromise (bad imo), but Fred will likely get the nomination.
--Ron has a weird foreign policy and idealistic view of the American economy. Marginal support from the base. Most libertarian folks.
2007-08-01 16:03:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rick 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I seem to recall that back in 1991 until 1992, the Democratic Party seemed to be in dissaray. However, when the Democratic Concention ended, the walked away united and had nominated William Jefferson Clinton for President. He won two terms. I hope that the Democrats see the comparison of the Republicans now, and the Democrats in 1992.
2007-08-01 17:16:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by ProLife Liberal 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does it matter? If you run Hillary, the GOP doesn't really need to run a campaign at all. It will be a matter of whether there are more people that can't stand her than blindly adore her, or vice versa.
Obama, on the other hand, may just be the next Hubert Humphrey.
2007-08-01 15:56:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by open4one 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yeah, I seem to remember somebody named Dean that was leading everybody by miles too this early last time and then it happened......Not just one speech, not just one paragraph, not just one sentence, not even just one thought. A single word screamed and ppppppffffffffffffftttttttttttttt FLAT on his face. So I'm glad to see people like you so happy at this point. Makes my and many others day.
2007-08-01 21:00:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gabriel Archangel 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I love that every day the real America out there sees exactly how corrupt and ugly the GOP is. Finally the country is waking up and realizing they were duped by lies and terror threats. They want the average American to be dumbed down. Look at the state of our educational system versus the world. Trailing behind the rest of the civilized world with no health care for the poor. Just keep watching American Idol, football, sand Nascar while the rich get richer and the GOP lies its way to the oval office. Check the latest polls you right wing wise guys,. Your hero's are getting thumped already. Looks like John Q. Public has had enough of your BS.
2007-08-01 16:03:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Any of the candidates you mentioned could beat Hillary. I hope the libs DO nominate her, it will just make it easier for the good guys.
2007-08-01 16:42:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cinner 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
i've got been Wiccan for 23 years and in no way heard of everybody naming a wand. So basically, provided that it particularly is your guy or woman ingredient that feels suitable to you, call it what feels suitable to you. Insulting wand-naming isn't insulting Wicca-- because of the fact wand-naming isn't area of Wicca. a lot of Wicca isn't Witchcraft-- it does not ought to contain Witchcraft in any respect. you may ought to keep getting to grasp on that, because of the fact your assertion is basically incorrect.
2016-11-10 23:36:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If it really looks like Hillary will win, I will sell my condo and move to Japan, or Australia, or my cancer won't kill me because I will have a stroke. Either way, the US will lose one taxpaying, charitable, productive citizen. I don't agree with your Fred = no money, but if Hillary wins all you Dems have to admit you got worse than you ever imagined
2007-08-01 16:02:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by SteveA8 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
There is always Ann Coulter. Wouldn't it be a bitching fight between Hillary and her?
2007-08-01 16:37:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by barry c 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
The only worthy candidate is Ron Paul. The rest will screw us as far as I can tell.
2007-08-01 16:03:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Maurice P 2
·
5⤊
2⤋