English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After they set off another staged 9/11 like event, Bush will declare martial law and remain in power for as long as his cronies and Lobbyists need him in power.

Didn't you see Bush's new self appointed powers "if" another National Crisis occurs.

When it happens don't act surprised! You have supported this criminal administration of power hungry illuminati's hell bent on controlling the world. They still need China and Russia, so they are not done!

When Bush and Company set off huge bombs in our largest cities, this will not be a joke anymore! Will you still be his sheep, or will you finally see the light!

And what will we do? will we be able to start a rebellion and overthrow Him or will it be too late?

2007-08-01 14:44:19 · 43 answers · asked by jimmy j 2 in Politics & Government Politics

you do also realize that he has mentioned more than ANY OTHER president that "things would be easier if I was dictator"

2007-08-01 14:47:16 · update #1

http://youtube.com/watch?v=YNo0_klKzis

2007-08-01 14:49:58 · update #2

oh, and even if he didn't stage 9/11, he's taking advantage of it.

2007-08-01 14:51:54 · update #3

and i've never done drugs, medical or recreational in my life, so thats pretty pointless.

2007-08-01 14:54:01 · update #4

that youtube link is my source.

2007-08-01 14:56:30 · update #5

43 answers

And when your prognostications do not come true, will you admit that you're an idiot? If President Bush was planning on staying in power, he'd side with the Democrats and outlaw all firearms and disarm the American public.

2007-08-01 14:54:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Well, it looks like most beat you up, but you did get a lot of answers and some good ones too. Frankly, the only ones you reached are the ones who have already done some reading on the subject. If you don't mind, a couple of suggestions:

Your question was good and it 'grabbed' people, but some facts and links are needed to hold their attention. Try to provide sources that are neutral, or even a little biased towards the ones you're trying to convince. Its hard to dispute whitehouse.gov releases and World Net Daily since they're not on the 'fringe', then you can slip in some biased to your view if needed. For example:

On September 21, 2006, Bush submitted a continuation of National Emergency, thus renewing Proclamation 7463 of September 14, 2001.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060921-13.html
http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2001/09/fr091801.html

In May 2007, Bush signed the National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive (NSPD 51/HSPD-20). This is what Ol'Sasquatch meant:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html
(HINT... open the link and search for 'congress')

Unlike the National Emergency Act that sets up congress as a balance, the new directive:
1. does not contain any provisions allowing for congressional approval or oversight.
2. creates the new position of National Continuity Coordinator without Congress approval
3. negates any requirement that the president submit proof of the existence of a National Emergency to Congress
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55824
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7986.shtml

You can also try a little humor with your sources:
Do Executive Orders (EOs) with "Federal Seizure" in the title make you a bit nervous?
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Establishing_martial_law_in_the_United_States
How about that National Emergency EO with no provisions for congressional oversight?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55824
What's not to love about FEMA?
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/fema_executive_orders.htm

Hope this helps some, I really hated to see you get blown off by most. I'm jealous though, I thought I hit the jackpot when 11 responded to one of my questions! ~~Cheers!

2007-08-01 16:24:20 · answer #2 · answered by sagacious_ness 7 · 2 2

A thousand dollars says it doesn't happen. Email me if you're serious about waging. I say he's out of office after next year and that not a SINGLE thing you list in your "question" comes to pass. Not a one.

"Now I'm only gonna tell ya' this once. You wanna keep working here, stay off the drugs." --- Cleo McDowell owner of "McDowells" over on Queens Boulevard.

2007-08-01 14:52:30 · answer #3 · answered by Bumblebee711 5 · 1 2

I believe you. Think of everything as a chapter in a book, NAFTA, immigration ,patriot act, terrorism, fema camps,chemtrails, executive orders,biometric implants, martial law, bilderburgs, etc. The name of the book is The New World Order. JFK warned us about it and George H.W. Bush said that it was the ultimate plan. Alone some of these things don't make sense but when you connect the dots.....

2007-08-01 15:01:51 · answer #4 · answered by dianer 5 · 1 3

You're right!
When bush and company set off huge bombs in our largest cities it will not be a joke.
Until then it's absolutely hilarious.
Besides, what are you worried about anyway, you obviously don't live on this planet.

Your real isn't Michael Moore by any chance?

2007-08-01 14:53:39 · answer #5 · answered by Mark S 3 · 1 3

"things would be easier if I were dictator"
Source, please.

Do you live in America? It must be very disturbing to live under a government you believe would slaughter almost 3000 innocent people just to further some kind of alleged agenda.
Get a clue.

2007-08-01 14:53:42 · answer #6 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2 1

"Dumbaya" will be gone (thank God) in 2008. I do know of the law they passed about suspending elections if there was another catastrophe in the United States. It was stupid for him to pass that bill because it can be used by ANY President whether Democrat or Republican.

I don't think that will happen with him, but it sets it up for someone else...

2007-08-01 14:53:56 · answer #7 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 2 3

Me thinks that folk should google 'May 9, 2007 president' to understand this better. King George scares the living daylights out of me. And what if Billery is elected???

Google it now!

The Ol' Sasquatch Ü

2007-08-01 14:56:39 · answer #8 · answered by Ol' Sasquatch 5 · 1 3

Seriously, you need to get back on your medication.
The same Supreme Court that put Bush in office has lost faith in him. His own party in Congress doesn't support him. Any attempt by Bush to so much as delay elections or the peaceful transfer of power would be met by an emergency session of both houses repealing any portion of the Patriot Act that you apparently believe gives Bush these powers.

2007-08-01 14:50:26 · answer #9 · answered by Gunz 2 · 1 6

No.He loves the White House.

2007-08-01 15:05:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers