I'm not talking about White House Counsel Fred Fielding, but a "keeping you *** out of jail" lawyer.
2007-08-01 14:27:08 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
he'll be the first president to be "jailed"...just watch...it's payback time and the DEMS are holding all the cards...just an observation, but so was my picking a DEM romp last year
2007-08-01 14:35:41 · update #1
That's a fun question. I've actually given it some thought. He has approved "Crimes against Humanity" among his trail of unbelievable mistakes. Isn't that what Saddam got hung for? They had to pull Him out of a hole in the ground. As much as I detest ol' Dub...live by the sword, die by the sword and all that. The position he has put the presidency is outrageous. They both need to get out of office asap and hope Nancy is dumb enough to pardon them....Don't do it Girl!!!
2007-08-01 15:12:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not until 2009
2007-08-01 21:30:21 · answer #2 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Never, because no laws were broken.
Even the Dem's admit this.
The President has the authority to replace any prosecutor at any time, for any reason.
Why Bush just doesn't come out and say, the Prosecutor's were not carrying out the agenda I wanted them to, and I replaced them.
That would solve the entire issue.
Thats why every President replaces alomost all the Prosecutors after they are elected.
2007-08-01 22:12:38 · answer #3 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton fired over 100 federal prosecutors and it wasn't a scandal then, so why is it now? Because the people in congress want to distract the public from the fact they aren't doing anything.
2007-08-01 21:59:58 · answer #4 · answered by lestermount 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The President firing people who serve strictly at the pleasure of the President is not a crime. It's only a scandal because Congress wants to distract you from the fact that they've basically only passed two pieces of legislation, one being their own pay raise.
2007-08-01 21:37:21 · answer #5 · answered by open4one 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Um bush isn't going to need a lawyer, even though I hate to admit it you can't touch Bush.
2007-08-01 21:29:59 · answer #6 · answered by jumpman247 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He's going to have to lawyer up over that one not long before he will for his "broader survellance program."
2007-08-01 21:30:36 · answer #7 · answered by Atavacron 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's already considered this possibility,and beyond with his move to Belize plan!
2007-08-01 21:30:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never. Look at Klinton, he perjured himself, was impeached and yet, no criminal charges were ever brought. Libby was guilty as much as Klinton was, but he didn't get off nearly as lucky, did he?
2007-08-01 21:30:31 · answer #9 · answered by LawGunGuy 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
"before"?????
That's what he's been doing since the scandal broke -- hiding behind executive privilege, since he has no other legal privilege he can even try to hide behind.
2007-08-01 21:30:51 · answer #10 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋