My maltese puppy had a broken leg. We took her in to the vet... and scheduled for surgery, she stayed over night there. The next day, I called to check on her. The nurse said that they were just starting the operation. My husband later received a call from the nurse saying that they had marked and shaved the wrong leg. My husband repeated that, and she said "yeah, so basically she has a matching leg"... The next day, I went to pick her up. They went over the xrays and how to take care of her (with the medicine and to keep her cast dry). BUT they did not even mention about how they shaved the wrong leg AND cut open/stitched up the wrong leg.
The vet had given me a verbal quote on the first day.. he said "about eleven to twelve hundred dollars"... but I was charged about $1636 (full price was $1736, but there's a $100 discount). The operation was to insert 2 pins at a joint.
Is cutting the wrong leg malpractice? And is it wrong not to tell us? What about reparations?
2007-08-01
14:24:30
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Busy Bee
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
1. I'm not looking to sue
2. They did not tell me about the extra cut at all
3. They handed me the dog at the time of the payment, and I was too excited to say hi to the dog that I didn't think of lifting the dog to see the leg. I saw the big orange cast on the correct leg, so the thought never occurred to me.
2007-08-01
15:08:35 ·
update #1