Nothing is the absence of everything and the scientific law "Nature abhors a vacuum." tells you what scientist think about it.
There has never been an area of nothing since before the big bang, and for all we know there was an earlier universe that was destroyed by the big bang.
Absolutes are very hard to reach and often impossible.
Absolute zero is when all molecule movement ceases. It is an impossible point to reach. The average temperature of space is 4 degrees above absolute zero.
The universe is mostly empty space, but there are some hydrogen atoms and other simple compounds that fill it so there is no absolute vacuum. Therefore there is no way to get nothing, a total lack of anything. There will always be something present, if you constraint the space of your nothing to something smaller than matter then you will have energy.
You can't reach a point of nothing, it is an absolute that involves perfection and nothing is perfect. That should be another law of science.
2007-08-01 13:18:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dan S 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
If it exist, then it's not nothing. An empty space maybe but it's still a space. By the way, there's a theory that universe is actually filled with a substance called dark matter. If I'm not mistaken, they are the ones that generate the gravity that keeps the universe 'intact'. So even the existence of an empty space is questionable.
2007-08-02 04:39:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by CR s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer additionally be responsive to the place to start up with your questions. first of all, you're making the theory that one and all scientists are atheists.no longer genuine.(basically the clever ones are LOL) it may be like asserting all Theists are ideas lifeless (of direction the certainty is that basically maximum of them are) How plenty technology have you ever certainly studied? there's a large number of info that the image voltaic gadget and the planets formed from dirt and count and accreted jointly over the path of billions of years. Darwin's theory of evolution is nice shown technology. the way germs and micro organism mutate or perhaps the variety of breeds of kin canines speaks to shown evolution. Your question on the different hand speaks volumes to a loss of evolution. i'm so happy for you which you carry a theory in Christianity some thing you have been taught and you of course in no way troubled to question.Its no longer even a majority faith in the international. the excellent ingredient approximately technology is that it particularly is questioned continually till shown otherwise. Scientists do no longer ought to worship gravity to be responsive to this is going to likely be there the following day.this would properly be a debate that has and could bypass on for hundreds of years.To believe the universe is 6000 years previous because of the fact the bible says is all good and positive for you.I even tend to consider shown medical strategies that date the Earth at 3&a million/2 billion years and the universe at approximately 12 billion.
2016-11-10 23:18:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe there is no empty space - maybe there is.
Maybe empty space is at least filled with energy (photons) even if there is no matter there.
What about the space between the nucleus of an atom and its orbiting electrons? This space constitutes >95% of the volume of an atom, so if it truely contains nothing, then all matter in the universe is really made of >95% nothing...
2007-08-01 16:41:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by asgspifs 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nothing is what hasn't been or will be ever. the absence of that thing before it is created. It is an absence.
2007-08-02 01:54:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's what my daughter tells me she is always doing, taught in school, plans to do in the future, wants for dinner, is watching on TV, and has been working toward all her life.
2007-08-01 13:17:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by kNOTaLIAwyR 7
·
2⤊
1⤋