Hillary is trying to be enough of a moderate to win a general election, as a result she is starting to annoy a lot of the hard core liberal primary voters. But there are many who take her all too seriously. Those who underestimate her may just hand her a victory that would be a disaster for the country. I think the Pentagon had justifiable concerns about giving her sensitive information since it is obvious that her goal is to undermine the success of their mission in Iraq. In their position I don't think I would offer aid to the enemy either.
2007-08-01 13:00:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by James L 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
i do no longer think of she's making plans extermination camps yet she somewhat is to blame of the three products you point out on your question. She of course would not comprehend economics and the functionality that the loose industry performs in maintaining and increasing the U. S. high quality of existence. She thinks government knows of ultimate and could administration our lives. She makes outlandish and punctiliously unsubstantiated costs that her enemies are out to get her. it somewhat is exceedingly hypocritical once you have self belief approximately how she and bill look the masters of the "politics of non-public destruction". She's one frightening lady - - she would be able to do regardless of it takes to realize her goals.
2016-10-13 10:19:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I do. Dick Cheney and George W.Bush have done nothing to make the U.S stronger and instead we are weakening. The U.S dollar is no longer as strong as it once was and the war is a joke gone wrong. Instead of dodging her answers Cheney should've just answered her, I personally would love to know when our troops are coming home. And when they do, I believe they should all get badges of honor and bravery for fighting in a war that should've never been.
2007-08-01 12:42:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by kirey65 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
Does anyone take Cheney seriously anymore? Doesn't the US Government have a policy of assassinating dictators? How come that policy doesn't apply to Cheney and Bush?
2007-08-01 12:42:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Yes. This is a blantant end run around the Constitutional separation of powers.
I seem to remember her voting in favor of the Iraq war. That doesn't mean she gets to run the show.
2007-08-01 12:44:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by MoltarRocks 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Secretary of Defense Gates is on record as saying her request was reasonable. Which should end the debate.
Cheney supporting his former aide Edelman in attacking a US Senator for asking for information is political bashing.
Cheney doesn't believe Congress should exist as an independent branch of govt, and asserts that (as Vice President) he is not part of the executive branch. And you want to take HIM seriously?
2007-08-01 12:42:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
3⤊
5⤋
So far her greatest qualification is lack of a penis.
Just like the greatest qualification any on the Republican side have is alleged possession of one. The politician who used to be John McCain looked good until he sold out in '04.
2007-08-01 12:44:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Seriously ill.
2007-08-01 12:54:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by trf6x6 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
We might not be ready for a woman in the white house but we may find her there. Seriously.
2007-08-01 12:41:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Miss Candi 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
I do not take her seriously and I really don't like her at all. Unfortunately, I am just one vote so I am afraid to see what will happen come election time.
2007-08-01 12:40:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Red Sox lover 6
·
4⤊
3⤋