How could the US troops withdraw from Iraq without causing more damages to us (Iraqis)?

Question

We didn't want the occupation
we didn't want Saddam and;
we don't want Al-Qaeda or any radical group to control us

Answer 1

The troops will leave as soon as we know the government formed by the Iraqi people will stand.

Answer 2

We don't know how we could withdraw now without causing Iraqis more damage. Our troops are making progress but it won't work unless the Iraqi government can make progress too. Right now the Iraqi government is not making progress on it's benchmarks. We can't stay there forever waiting for that to happen. So if the Iraqi government doesn't do what it promised to do on benchmarks, the US will have to withdraw anyway. I am sorry that it is that way, but we can only do so much. Your people will soon have to take over what the US is doing. I hope for the best. However, from the looks of things you are not really an Iraqi. Too much time in jokes and riddles.

Answer 3

Many experts agree that what is happenning in Iraq is a simple CIVIL WAR that was un-leashed by Bush's illegal lie based war .Decades of pent up religious/ethic animosities which could never be resolved in a ruthless right wing dictatorship have now exploded.

However the presence of the powerful US military is preventing an all out "normal" civil war like say the US had .

So what is happening is a slowly smoldering civil war that daily is slaughtering hundreds of innocent Iraqis with no end in sight.

Many believe that if the US left abruptly,the Iraqis can get on with their civil war (just like the Americans did) and get it over with in a hell of a lot less time and with a hell of a lot less casualties than if the US stays.

After the US and the West have committed so many atrocities in the Middle East over the past century ALL B ECAUSE OF OIL,the Muslims/Arabs are at long last trying to throw off their dispicable right wing dictators eventhough the US is doing everything it can to keep these vile despots in power .

Answer 4

OK, so the question is WHAT DO YOU WANT? There has been infighting in that "country" forever. Can't you guys find some sort of common ground. All we hear about is the shiites and the sunnis going at it all the time, and when there's but 40 deads in a day, it's a slow day. So you don't want democracy, that's too hard? You prefer a theocracy, with a sharia and the hand-chopping stuff? You want the rigidity of Iran, or that of Saudi Arabia, or the talibans as neighbors? Good luck. Yes, it's time to bring the boys home and let you deal with your own mess.

Answer 5

Well then pull yourselves together and get some type of leadership and government. We didn't want the occupation either. Saddam was your problem as far as I was concerned. Many of us didn't want the invasion either and suffered massive onslaughts to our integrity and patriotism because of it. We don't want Al-Queda or any other extremest groups controlling us either. Now how you're going to get the US out is a whole other problem I think we may have become your best buddy and are staying for a long while.

Answer 6

no one thinks Bush will withdraw from Iraq, the two those that agree or disagree with him think of that. i think of it somewhat is impossible that Bush and Cheney would be impeached and removed from place of work (yet it somewhat is yet another question). so as which skill we will not see withdrawal till a minimum of 2009. The question is: Will our new president withdraw the troops? all of the Democratic applicants and some of the Republicans say they are going to, yet i'm sufficiently previous to remember yet another election in accordance with yet another unpopular conflict. Nixon suggested he had a 'secret plan' to end the conflict, yet as quickly as he have been given in place of work he got here across it to his very own political benefit to maintain the conflict going yet another 4 years, in actuality increasing troop power and widening the conflict from Vietnam to Laos and Cambodia. if actuality learn that wars like this are plenty easier to get into than to get out of. those people who adversarial the conflict from the beginning up knew this moving into.

Answer 7

You withdraw from the outlying areas first..you don't make any announcments...you just go. Then pull back from the least resistance impacted areas..again, no announcments. Then you move slowly out of the more impacted areas to a series of well defended staging areas. Gradually you move out your non essential equipment and people. Latter, at a accelerated pace you move out your forces. It shouldn't take any longer to get out of Iraq than it took to get in...probably less time. Then we let someone else worry about the Iraqis....it's obvious they don't want the US to worry about them.

Answer 8

Maybe it's going to require that the Sunis, Shiites and Kurds split into separate republics, and start fighting your own battles against Al Qeda, they thrive on causing chaos and winning at all costs worst than us.

Answer 9

If people of Iraq unite as they united in the FORM of a football team, none will interfere and the nation will rise.

Answer 10

They can't but the Dems don't care. They wont to go to Darfur instead. It is interesting that we have never left Korea, Turkey, Japan, Bosnia, or many other places. Sorry it is politics and the Dems must secure defeat to win power.