It's better than having an ignoramous in office who steals from his own people and send american boys to die in foreign lands so that we can briefly bring about democracy to land that's out of control, although we the USA do not control it and have no rights to it.
2007-08-01 11:41:02 · 7 answers · asked by AL v 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
It would probably work out better!
2007-08-01 11:44:08 · answer #1 · answered by Hathor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even in this age of super-fast computers and instant access the logistics of trying to hold an election with millions of voters is staggering beyond belief.
Even if we did have a system that worked and allowed everyone to vote with relative ease, some people would still complain about vote rigging and stolen election results. Enough reasonable doubt would make even that system untrustworthy.
2007-08-01 11:49:26 · answer #2 · answered by Mathsorcerer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did the election of Nov. 2010 coach liberals no longer something? It became the main important potential swing in American historic previous. And the tide has nevertheless no longer ebbed. people are cleansing out the socialists and changing them with GOP/Tea social gathering applicants who're for people.
2016-12-15 03:09:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be a Democracy. This country is a constitutional Republic.
2007-08-01 12:12:19 · answer #4 · answered by KD7ONE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the masses are the best choice to make these decisions either...have you dealt with the masses? How about an intelligent president, who gets to screw who he wants?
2007-08-01 11:43:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not understand at all how you can call anyone an ignoramus... you can not even put a sentence together...LOL!
2007-08-01 13:07:52 · answer #6 · answered by Clown 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no cuz think about wars/911 attack helping lower things
2007-08-01 11:49:10 · answer #7 · answered by baby_isabella@verizon.net 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋