If he was elected do you think that his personal saftey would be at risk with his "radical views" of following the constitution and kicking big business/big government in the butt? Or on a similar note, what about Clintons personal saftey?
2007-08-01 10:24:25 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If Clinton was elected is what I meant by the second question.
2007-08-01 10:30:50 · update #1
I think Ron Paul would be a potential target. But most Corporate big-wigs would just pay their pet Senators to squash every bit of legislation that comes out the White House, weather the next four years, then vote Ron out 'because he didn't achieve anything.'
2007-08-01 10:31:07 · answer #1 · answered by Chredon 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The guy would accomplish nothing because he's a corrupt politician like all the rest of them. He won't do anything beneficial unless he can push through some of his crazy schemes with it. No one will go for it so nothing will get done. I've talked to the guy myself. He's a loser. He has no chance of getting elected. But if he did he would just be a lame duck for 4 years and then get voted out.
2007-08-01 17:49:57 · answer #2 · answered by James L 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure why the Clinton's safety would be an issue if Ron Paul were President. As for his safety, every President gets death threat, whther liberal, conservative, or something in between.
2007-08-01 17:29:24 · answer #3 · answered by Chance20_m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is the Corporate Candidate on the "Left",so she would be safe.
Ron Paul,though,wouldn't be able to come out of the White House if he were elected
2007-08-01 17:28:20 · answer #4 · answered by David R 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no
2007-08-01 17:32:13 · answer #5 · answered by TEXAS TREY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋