You said it - he's very raw. He's very athletic, and I like his arm strength, but he needs at least another year before he will be a good quarterback. Unfortunately, that means you will have to suffer a year. He should be fun to watch at least tho.
2007-08-02 03:35:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jim Baw 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well not to be mean or anything but I'm going to have to agree with your friends. The fact that you are a Vikings fan allows you to see past a lot of major flaws that players might have and truly believe that they are much better than they really are. Jackson is going to be nothing more than a mediocre back up quarterback and Childress is going to find that out really fast this season on his way to receiving his pink slip.
2007-08-01 10:20:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jackson will not be the starter for long in Minnesota. Vikes will end up 6-10.
2007-08-01 10:50:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
vikings are definitely flying under the radar. I don't know if Jackson is necessarily the answer to all of your problems, but a backfield consisting of Adrian Peterson and Taylor and a young talented receiving corps consisting of Sidney Rice, your offense is quite potent. I'm SURE that the Bears are coming off their high horse from the division crown, but I have my money on the Lions beating them out...that's just me.
2007-08-01 10:12:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by wiseonekms 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only a real Vikings homer would think Jackson will be a good QB. Listen to your friends, they're right.
2007-08-01 12:23:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by stan l 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, He is a very good athlete. He has shown that he has what it takes to be a great Quarterback in the league, however he needs to maintain that level throughout his career unlike Culpepper has. He is pretty much all they have, so I am going to have to say they have no choice with this, as of right now. But I think they are in good hands.
2007-08-01 10:11:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by ericpete16 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think hes the most underrated QB. Hes definatly not top 10, but people give him so much crap. Hes acually decent
2007-08-01 10:38:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by hipo8000 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
he did great last year the vikings are going to have a great seoson
2007-08-01 10:11:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
hes a great athelte... i think he will be a pretty good player as he develops... your right hes big...strong arm...and moblie...so he can be dangerous...in terms of the viks...i think they are going to suck again this year
2007-08-01 10:39:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by matthew 5
·
0⤊
0⤋