Ricky pointing is a genuine match winner and a finisher whereas Sachin tendulkar is one of the greatest ever but never been a genuine match winner and a finisher.
I know in 1990 s there were LARA s, TENDULKAR s, Steve waugh lang s but that belongs to WASIM AKRAM- Said by RAVI SHASTRI.
Inzamam a better match winner than 10dulkar endash Said by IMRAN KHAN {FACT FILE}
Sachin has more man of the match bcoz referees want India to be happy simple is that otherwise he does not deserve it, since he is a choker.Fact File
Facts & Figures say that Lara is far better match winner then tendulkar and faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar more reliable:
Ravi Shastri said that Lara in test matches is a bigger player than Tendulkar.
Lara played 2 less test matches than sachin but has 1000 runs more do u know that ?
TENDULKAR IN TEST 21 NOT OUTs THAT IS WHY HIS AVERAGE IS 57 AND LARA JUST HAS 8 NOT OUTs THAT IS WHY HIS AVERAGE IS 54.{FACT FILE}
In ODI s Tendulkar played 100 more that is why he is a head of Lara.{FACT FILE}
EVEN TENDULKAR SAID ONCE THAT HE NEEDS TO IMPROVE HIS MATCH FINISHING ABILITIES, and unfortunately he will never do so bcoz his career is ending {FACT FILE}
So how a choker can be the best?
TENDULKAR = Class act, one of the very best ever but chocker at the same time so he can not be the WORLD BEST. Prove
of TENDULKAR chocking abilities 1-Against AUS in SHARJAH he made a great century but guess what INDIA lost the match. 2-Test match against PAK in INDIA TENDULKAR made a great century with a back injury but guess what INDIA lost the match by few runs.3- TENDULKAR made a great 100 against W.I in his comeback match but guess what INDIA lost that match to.4-TENDULKAR played one of the best inning of his life against PAK in the WOLD CUP 2003 but guess what when he lost his wicket INDIA already lost the striker
SHEWAG,Captain GANGULY hand INDIA needed more than 100 runs but courtesy to DRAVID,INDIA won that match but TENDULKAR failed again to finish the match. {FACT FILE}
Lara = record breaker (e.g) 400 in test ,500 in domestic,fastest fifty in test , most runs in an over in test most runs in an ODI of world cup.
hey Indians u lost to me bcoz u do not have facts to prove tendulkar better than lara hahahhah lol =))
i m not like Indian foooooooooool to support whatever is false
Lara has more double hundreds than any current players.{FACT FILE}
Lara is the best leave the rest.
AUSTRALIAN TEAM RECENTLY VOTED LARA AS THE BEST & THE DEADLEAST BATSMEN OF ALL.
LARA IN 1996 WORLD CUP MATCH AGAINST INDIA WORE GLASSES AND WON THE MATCH 4 HIS COUNTRY.
Lara a match winner and a great finisher but Tendulkar is not yet a finisher see his record.
2007-08-01 11:01:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Everybody will agree that Ponting is the more consistent and better finisher than Tendulkar at present and has better test batting average.He is two years younger to Tendulkar and ultimately may even beat more records.
Though now Tendulkar is a shadow of his own self,that should not belittle his earlier records and take away his greatness.He had his moments.
One answerer above while roaring like a lion has given some wrong facts.
1.In the first Sharjah match against Australia he scored a century and lost the match but not before overtaking Newzealand on NRR to qualify for the finals.In the very next match (the finals) against Australia he scored another century and won the Finals for India.
2.In the 2003 WC his 90+(before getting out due to cramps) against Pakistan was the stepping stone for victory.
3. He was also a useful bowler in tests and particularly ODIs.Who can forget the 50th over bowled by him in a final(Hero cup?) Vs South Africa to win a thriller for India.
4. Let us not forget that Tendulkar (Indians in general)have faced more great fast bowlers than other countrymen (minus perhaps a handful like Kapildev,Srinath,Zaheer..).
So Tendulkar's greatness will be acknowledged by the knowledgeable.
This should not give liberty to people like roaring lions to call 'Indian fools'.It is below our dignity to call anyone a fool.
2007-08-02 05:36:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by karikalan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Untill 2003 Sachin Tendulkar was better than poning. Figures show us that.
Sachin suffered Injuries and was in and out of the team. Greg Chappel had different plans for Tendulkar a change in gear. Sachin started to play a slow game not his normal game. His game began to suffer.
After 2003 until 2007 worldcup. Ricky Ponting was better than Sachin Tendulkar. He was the best batsman during this period. He was on top of the cricket rankings always between 1 to 3 both in ODI and Test. He is the higest run maker in this season.
After WC 2007 Sachin has changed his gear. he's playing his natural game now. If he continues his same game, he would be again the best batsmen.
This year alone Ricky Pointing has scored 984 runs at avegare of 70.28 strike rate of 91.30
50 = 7
100 = 3
more runs and is in top rankings.
Sachin this year has scored 514 runs at average of 46.72 strike rate of 89
50 = 5
100 = 1 (not out)
This not out has helped his avg this year. Sachin's Avg would have been lesser if he was out when he scored the century.
2007-08-01 17:49:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Akar 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ponting is better batsman than Sachin. Because he can adjust to all conditions. He plays well in England under swinging conditions, spinning pitches in the sub-continent and on the grassy pitches. Potning also very consistent. Some day Definitely Ponting will break most of the Test and ODI batting records.
2007-08-01 18:07:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Thamara 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
ppl say dat sachin is the best(as a batsman)bt according to me punter is bettr dan di best...hez a superb batsmen...a vry sensible 1...nd no doubt hez a rely gud captain..nd as amazing fieldin capibility.
Australian cricket captain, Ricky Ponting, is one of cricket's most gifted batsmen. From Test Matches to the One-Day version of the game, Ricky has lead the world champion team with strength, courage, honesty and dignity.
so i say Ponting is the better tahn sachin.
2007-08-02 00:40:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by prasy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
from 2 or 3 years Ponting is better then SAchin. but overall Sachin is best
2007-08-01 18:10:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If one takes carreer records, Sachjin Tendulkar is better batsman than Ponting. However, if you take the records of
recent past only, Ponting is a better batsman.
2007-08-01 11:21:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ya sachin is better than ponting since he has scored more runs than him in both format of the game
2007-08-02 01:03:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by samran 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
when sachin was young he was best player but now ponting is a good batsman but its a game of luck both r great player
2007-08-01 18:00:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by raja a 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
are you dumb. sachin is the best sachin is at the finishing line ricky is just starting now so sachin is the best
2007-08-02 08:33:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋